NODE dcf9d115Re: Registering Keys with Big Brother
Arthur Abraham <a2@well.sf.ca.us>Mon, 26 Oct 92 22:54:33 PPE
Seems to me that there would be a certain amount of trouble with people
registering one private key but communicating with another they had
forgotten to register. Bad situation for my large sibling 'cause he
wouldn't realize this until after the court order etc. A good solution
would be BIG fines for mis-encryption and sampling of messages to make sure
they were properly formed -- for our own protection, of course. And if
they happened to radomly sample something they didn't like... for instance
finding my obviously excessive paranoia....
-a2.
NODE 40122c10Re: Registering Keys with Big Brother
gnu@cygnus.comTue, 27 Oct 92 00:24:43 PPE
Arthur Abrahams incisively notes:
> Seems to me that there would be a certain amount of trouble with people
> registering one private key but communicating with another they had
> forgotten to register. Bad situation for my large sibling 'cause he
> wouldn't realize this until after the court order etc. A good solution
> would be BIG fines for mis-encryption and sampling of messages...
There is no need for sampling of messages. You don't understand the
theory of power. Simply make the penalty for encryption without registry,
larger than the penalty for any other crime. Then no crime can be hidden
behind it. It's like getting Al Capone for income tax evasion; if you
investigate someone and they are enforcing privacy on their communications,
you can put them in jail for life for that, and can stop worrying about the
original suspected offense.
John