NODE 44f3e039use of ripem instead of pgp
BRIAN MCBEE <opac!brian%OPAC.osl.or.gov@CS.ORST.EDU>Fri, 15 Jan 93 12:57:34 PST
> RIPEM is Mark Riordan's public-key program. It is similar to PEM, but does
> not use the PEM certificates and therefore does not require people to have
> their keys signed by an agency. It is not really PEM compatible. It does
> use the RSAREF public-domain encryption package, so it is legal for non-
> commercial use in the U.S. and Canada.
>
> What I suggested was the use of RIPEM since it is available now, is legal,
> and is free.
>
> Note, though, that whether RIPEM or PGP is used, they are only for non-
> commercial use. A remailer that wanted to charge, such as the ones that
> Eric Messick is discussing, would probably have to license the technology
> from PKP directly to be legal. (I'm not sure whether PEM also is limited
> to non-commercial use.)
>
> Hal Finney
> 74076.1041@compuserve.com
Since the only reason we are talking about RIPEM is because of legality
concerns about PGP, I thought I'd mention that it is (at least theoretically)
illegal to export RIPEM from the US, annd therefore could not be legally used
to correspond with persons overseas.
I don't know if there is a legal way to do public key cryptography between
persons inside the US and persons outside the US.
----- Brian McBee ----- (503)378-4276 ----- brian@opac.osl.or.gov -----
----- Oregon State Library, State Library Building, Salem, OR 97310 -----
Plan globally, attack locally
NODE aec3b402Re: use of ripem instead of pgp
uri@watson.ibm.comFri, 15 Jan 93 13:26:42 PST
BRIAN MCBEE says:
> Since the only reason we are talking about RIPEM is because of legality
> concerns about PGP, I thought I'd mention that it is (at least theoretically)
> illegal to export RIPEM from the US, annd therefore could not be legally used
> to correspond with persons overseas.
RSAREF isn't legally exportable - that's correct. But RIPEM certainly
is. And there's nothing to prevent those overseas from using RIPEM
with whatever RSA and DES implementations they wish (they have at
least three good ones to choose from :-).
> I don't know if there is a legal way to do public key cryptography between
> persons inside the US and persons outside the US.
a) If "they" teach PGP to understand PEM - we could use RIPEM here
to talk to them (they will use PGP, naturally).
b) If they get legal RIPEM and marry it with RSA/DES - we could talk
with them using RIPEM on both ends.
--
Regards,
Uri uri@watson.ibm.com scifi!angmar!uri N2RIU
-----------
<Disclamer>