Re: Letter to FCC

In Message Sat, 13 Feb 93 7:29:25 PST,
  kumr.lns.com!pozar@netcomsv.netcom.com (Tim Pozar) writes:

>   I should add, it needs to be formated properly or it will not be read
>into the record and just tossed.   Some where around here I have an
>example folks can use.  I will dig it up and post it in a day or so.
>
     Well this is a nice little way for the government to bypass public
opinion.  "If it's not formatted right we won't read it."

DrZaphod
[AC/DC] / [DnA][HP]
[drzaphod@ncselxsi.uucp]
Technicolorized

(Tim Pozar) writes:
>   I should add, it needs to be formated properly or it will not be read
>into the record and just tossed.   Some where around here I have an
>example folks can use.  I will dig it up and post it in a day or so.


  Here is the format of the letter.  It need to be in there by this
Monday!  So Fed-Ex today!

---

                                 Before the
                     FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
                             Washington, DC 20554
 
In the matter of                       )
                                       )
Amendment of Parts 2 and 15 to         )
Prohibit Marketin of Radio Scanners    )   ET Docket No. 93-1
Capable of Intercepting Cellular       )
Telephone Conversations                )
 
                      _COMMENTS OF [FULL NAME OF COMPANY]_
 
                                 _INTRODUCTION_
 
[Full name of company] (hereinafter "[abbreviation of company]") respectfully
submits its comments to the above captioned _Notice of Proposed Rule Makeing_
("NPRM"). [Abbreviation of company] is a [description of company].
 
                                  _BACKGROUND_
 
blah, blah, blah
 
                                 _DISCUSSION_
 
blah, blah, blah
 
                                 _CONCLUSION_
 
blah, blah, blah
 
                                      Respectfully submitted
 
 
 
 
                                      [Name of Person]
                                      [Full name of company]


-- 
    Internet: pozar@kumr.lns.com     FidoNet: Tim Pozar @ 1:125/555
Snail: Tim Pozar / KKSF / 77 Maiden Lane / San Francisco CA 94108 / USA
                        Voice: +1 415 788 2022

I just got a call back from Dave Wilson of the FCC and told me that
there is a minor change in the form I sent out. Everything after the
"INTRODUCTION" line should be double spaced.

               Tim
-- 
    Internet: pozar@kumr.lns.com     FidoNet: Tim Pozar @ 1:125/555
Snail: Tim Pozar / KKSF / 77 Maiden Lane / San Francisco CA 94108 / USA
                        Voice: +1 415 788 2022

DrZaphod wrote:
> In Message Sat, 13 Feb 93 7:29:25 PST,
>   kumr.lns.com!pozar@netcomsv.netcom.com (Tim Pozar) writes:
> >   I should add, it needs to be formated properly or it will not be read
> >into the record and just tossed.   Some where around here I have an
> >example folks can use.  I will dig it up and post it in a day or so.
>
>      Well this is a nice little way for the government to bypass public
> opinion.  "If it's not formatted right we won't read it."

  Ever try to mail order tickets for Grateful Dead concerts? :-)

                       Tim
-- 
    Internet: pozar@kumr.lns.com     FidoNet: Tim Pozar @ 1:125/555
Snail: Tim Pozar / KKSF / 77 Maiden Lane / San Francisco CA 94108 / USA
                        Voice: +1 415 788 2022