// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: DES

4 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE b92121e6Re: DES
My take on breaking DES would be to just try all 2**56th keys on a 
massively parallel machine, though there may be better approaches.
Keith
NODE db2f555fRe: DES
> My take on breaking DES would be to just try all 2**56th keys on a 
> massively parallel machine, though there may be better approaches.
> Keith

This isn't breaking DES. The best any encryption scheme can hope
for is to only be broken by exhaustive search.
NODE e965af2eRe: DES
> My take on breaking DES would be to just try all 2**56th keys on a 
> massively parallel machine, though there may be better approaches.

A massively parallel colection of dedicated DES encryption hardware
might be more cost effective if had alot of these things to crack.

Speaking of which, does anyone know who makes "the DES chip" (is
there more than one?)? I'd like to find a data sheet for it.


brad
NODE 32d7c4c1Re: DES
> 
> 
> > My take on breaking DES would be to just try all 2**56th keys on a 
> > massively parallel machine, though there may be better approaches.
> 
> A massively parallel colection of dedicated DES encryption hardware
> might be more cost effective if had alot of these things to crack.
> 
> Speaking of which, does anyone know who makes "the DES chip" (is
> there more than one?)? I'd like to find a data sheet for it.
> 
> 
> brad
> 

Many manufacturers make DES chips.  One that comes to mind is American Micro
Devices, though I don't remember a part number off hand.  I can find out and
post it to the list.  I do remember reading the data sheet, and it looked
like a nice implementation.  If I'm not mistaken, Motorola makes one as well,
though it may have been obsoleted by improvements in speed.