NODE c5d64c3fRe: Handling Abuses of Remailers
fen@genmagic.genmagic.com (Fen Labalme)Wed, 3 Mar 93 11:20:06 PST
> Re: remailer price schedules
>
> My guess on all this is that you could make an awful lot of money at a
> dime a hop for a less-than-10K message. Sell hops only in packages
> of a hundred, in order to reduce your finance charges.
Geeez, Eric! I'd think a penny a hop would be a pretty high price... And
given that most messages go through two hops, then you'd really be giving
your 2 cents worth!
Note that there can be about 50 cypherpunks messages a day -- if each went
through 2 hops at $0.10 / hop, as you proposed, that would be $10 / day in
revenues for the remailers. Seems like a lot to me.
I would support the idea if I felt that the system would quiet the flame
wars, but I think rather it would simply quiet the poor...
Fen
NODE 43ce807bHandling Abuses of Remailers
tribble@memex.com (E. Dean Tribble)Fri, 5 Mar 93 00:45:39 PST
I would support the idea if I felt that the system would quiet the flame
wars, but I think rather it would simply quiet the poor...
Not at all. It would merely prevent them from using those particular
anonymous remailers. Still a problem, but much less of one.
dean
NODE a4b62bc6ANON: Re: Handling Abuses of Remailers
Johan Helsingius <julf@penet.FI>Wed, 3 Mar 93 14:52:32 PST
> Note that there can be about 50 cypherpunks messages a day -- if each went
> through 2 hops at $0.10 / hop, as you proposed, that would be $10 / day in
> revenues for the remailers. Seems like a lot to me.
Uh... If anon.penet.fi charged $0.10 / message for the 3000 messages a
day it's curently handling that would give me $9,000/month - no problem
upgrading the hardware! ;-)
But...
> I would support the idea if I felt that the system would quiet the flame
> wars, but I think rather it would simply quiet the poor...
*Quiet* the flame wars? I can already hear them scream "and he is even
getting *money* from terrorizing the net!!" ;-)
I think anon.penet.fi will have to remain a for-free, public service...
Julf