// COMPLETE THREAD

Hiding Encrypted Messages

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE b836ae33Hiding Encrypted Messages
I think it would be quite easy to hide encrypted text in music/sound or
graphics files.

In order to do it with sampled music/sound:

1.  Use a SoundBlaster-type card to sample a given amount of music from a
radio/tape/cd/whatever using 8-bit samples at some low sampling rate
like 11,000 samples/second. This would give you a lot of music for the
space used.

2. Then take an encrypted PGP file and dispurse it bit-by-bit into the
LSB (least-significant-bit) of each sample.  This wouldn't distort the
sound sample to any extent noticable by the human ear.  Thus each byte
of PGP file would be dispursed into 8 bytes of sound file.  Thus if
you wanted to send a 20k PGP file, you would have to put it into a
160k music file. 

If you're ever forced to explain what that file contains (unlikely, since
you can always take the Fifth Ammendment) you can just play it on your
computer and have the NSA/SS/FBI/Whatever listen to James Brown go
"Hyeeeah... I feel good!"



+---------------+     +-------------------------------------------------+
                      |  *****       ___\!/_   *         *     *     *  |
 Murdering Thug       |    *      __/_  /|\    * *       *      *   *   |
                      |    *     /    \        *   *     *       * *    |
thug@phantom.com      |    *    |      |       *     *   *        *     |
                      |    *     \____/        *       * *        *     |
                      |  *****                 *         *        *     |
+---------------+     +-------------------------------------------------+
NODE 369249ecRe: Hiding Encrypted Messages
Murdering Thug says:
> I think it would be quite easy to hide encrypted text in music/sound or
> graphics files.
> 1.  Use a SoundBlaster-type card to sample a given amount of music from a
> radio/tape/cd/whatever using 8-bit samples at some low sampling rate
> like 11,000 samples/second. This would give you a lot of music for the
> space used.
> 2. Then take an encrypted PGP file and dispurse it bit-by-bit into the
> LSB (least-significant-bit) of each sample.  This wouldn't distort the
> sound sample to any extent noticable by the human ear.  Thus each byte
> of PGP file would be dispursed into 8 bytes of sound file.  Thus if
> you wanted to send a 20k PGP file, you would have to put it into a
> 160k music file.
> If you're ever forced to explain what that file contains (unlikely, since
> you can always take the Fifth Ammendment) you can just play it on your
> computer and have the NSA/SS/FBI/Whatever listen to James Brown go
> "Hyeeeah... I feel good!"

a) This method has essentially the same complexity, as one-time pad,
   but without it's strength.

b) If it's played and recognized - one can trace your source (a CD, a
   tape of radio broadcast, whatever) and do a comparison. Then the
   file containing of all the LSBs is cryptanalyzed...

I might be wrong IF those nice LSBs are too hard to track... But then
again, you're facing the need to communicate that one-time pad...

> +---------------+     +-------------------------------------------------+
>                       |  *****       ___\!/_   *         *     *     *  |
>  Murdering Thug       |    *      __/_  /|\    * *       *      *   *   |
>                       |    *     /    \        *   *     *       * *    |
> thug@phantom.com      |    *    |      |       *     *   *        *     |
>                       |    *     \____/        *       * *        *     |
>                       |  *****                 *         *        *     |
> +---------------+     +-------------------------------------------------+

Oh yes, and I'm sure LOTS of people would join! (:-)
--
Regards,
Uri         uri@watson.ibm.com      scifi!angmar!uri 	N2RIU
-----------
<Disclamer>