// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE ff3049baRe: You Aren't [I'm Not]
>   Date: Tue, 2 Mar 93 10:51:31 EST
>   From: pmetzger@shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger)
>
>   **You aren't arguing for non-anonymity.** You are arguing that free
>   speech is bad.
>

> In Message Tue, 2 Mar 93 16:57:22 -0500,
>  Theodore Ts'o <Athena.MIT.EDU!tytso@netcomsv.netcom.com> writes:
>
>**No, I am not argueing for non-anonymity.**  Please stop defending your
>position by putting misrepresentations in my mouth.

     Aren't these the same thing?  TTFN!

[Waiting for reply: "That's the same thing!"]

DrZaphod
[AC/DC] / [DnA][HP]
[drzaphod@ncselxsi.uucp]
Technicolorized
NODE d6b59253Re: You Aren't [I'm Not]
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 93 13:13:25 CST  
   From: "DrZaphod" <ncselxsi!drzaphod@ncselxsi.netcom.com>
   Sender: ncselxsi!drzaphod@ncselxsi.netcom.com

   > In Message Tue, 2 Mar 93 16:57:22 -0500,
   >  Theodore Ts'o <Athena.MIT.EDU!tytso@netcomsv.netcom.com> writes:
   >
   >**No, I am not argueing for non-anonymity.**  Please stop defending your
   >position by putting misrepresentations in my mouth.

	Aren't these the same thing?  TTFN!

Sorry; typo on my part.  What I meant to say was "No, I am not arguing
that free speach is bad."  Mr. Metzger was putting words in my mouth
when claimed that I was saying that.

Anonymity and free speach are *NOT* the same thing.  As I posited in an
earlier message, which no one has yet to comment on, those two concepts
are not the same thing.  

Sorry for the typo; in my outrage that he would stoop to such depths to
make his point, and what I meant to say and what I actually typed
weren't the same thing.

							- Ted