NODE acd08cbealt.whistleblowers
Clark Reynard <clark@metal.psu.edu>Tue, 13 Apr 93 17:28:43 PDT
I suggest that as a first step in the process of making alt.whistleblowers
a reality, that we kick around the idea for a while, either here
or on alt.config. If I receive a positive response, I will
post the control message myself.
Three possible choices of action:
1) Kick it around on alt.config.
2) Kick it around on news.groups, etc.
3) Kick it around here.
4) Don't even bother kicking it around; just create the group,
and hell with anyone who doesn't like it.
So, what's the general consensus on the best course of action?
And, yes, I know that was four, and not three possible choices;
it's probably really eight or ten.
----
Robert W. Clark
rclark@nyx.cs.du.edu PGP signature available by mail or finger
NODE 1c68fd0aRe: alt.whistleblowers
mark@coombs.anu.edu.au (Mark)Tue, 13 Apr 93 18:17:29 PDT
>4) Don't even bother kicking it around; just create the group,
> and hell with anyone who doesn't like it.
We're sposed to be anarchists right? :) 'sides alt.* groups come out daily
with little or no discussion. Ours wont rock boats, at least in it's creation,
the content is a different story. Personally I hope it doesnt degenrate into a
narc fest for people who have grudges against people... that would be sad..
I vote to just make it. Not all will like it, but then they are maybe the ones
who will feature in it (great way to shut them up :).
Mark
mark@coombs.anu.edu.au
NODE 07167a8eRe: alt.whistleblowers
Joe Thomas <jthomas@access.digex.com>Tue, 13 Apr 93 19:18:30 PDT
On Wed, 14 Apr 1993, Mark wrote:
> >4) Don't even bother kicking it around; just create the group,
> > and hell with anyone who doesn't like it.
>
> We're sposed to be anarchists right? :) 'sides alt.* groups come out daily
> with little or no discussion. Ours wont rock boats, at least in it's creation,
> the content is a different story. Personally I hope it doesnt degenrate into a
> narc fest for people who have grudges against people... that would be sad..
>
> I vote to just make it. Not all will like it, but then they are maybe the ones
> who will feature in it (great way to shut them up :).
Couldn't hurt to mention it in alt.config. It would probably get a good
response, and get propagated more widely (some newsadmins are a bit
skeptical about newgroups from out of the blue...)
Joe
--
Joe Thomas <jthomas@access.digex.com>
PGP key available by request or by finger.
PGP key fingerprint: 1E E1 B8 6E 49 67 C4 19 8B F1 E4 9D F0 6D 68 4B
NODE e2e3b9f1Re: alt.whistleblowers
Brad Huntting <huntting@advtech.uswest.com>Wed, 14 Apr 93 08:42:16 PDT
> 1) Kick it around on alt.config.
I think this is the best option. news.groups is (mostly) for standard
"usenet" hierarchies (e.g. misc.whisleblowers).
If you mention "discussed in alt.config" in your newgroup I think you
will get much better reception.
brad