Re: Software infrastructure

Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu> writes:

> I propose that interested cypherpunks write a DOS terminal program
> which _is_ free software.  In order to overcome the inertia which Hal
> properly observes is endemic to any software change, I submit that to
> have source code available to fix or add features deemed desirable
> will be a key factor in acceptance of this software.  I have my own
> ideas about multiplexing the channel to support background POP and
> file transfer, but I'll leave that for later.  Such software, of
> course, would be properly layered to be able to add encryption at the
> key junctures.

I may be able to help out in a DOS project (though I seem to be migrating  
quickly to Linux as it stabilizes...)  Perhaps the GPL'ed program term  
would be useful in serial multiplexing applications.  It's quite nice for  
Unix boxes, letting all kinds of streams coexist (even redirecting TCP/IP  
ports over serial without the overhead of SLIP/PPP).  I believe I've  
heard someone on comp.os.linux or gnu.misc.discuss talk about hacking DES  
into term, so it sounds doable.  I'm not sure how much the code assumes  
Unix serial device handing, but I'll have a look at the code.

Joe

> I may be able to help out in a DOS project (though I seem to be migrating  
> quickly to Linux as it stabilizes...)  Perhaps the GPL'ed program term  
> would be useful in serial multiplexing applications.  It's quite nice for  
> Unix boxes, letting all kinds of streams coexist (even redirecting TCP/IP  
> ports over serial without the overhead of SLIP/PPP).  I believe I've  

on a similar note the DNET protocol for amiga is quite nice.  It comes
with a nice socket like library.  Works quite efficiently but contains
no information about addressing (it is strictly point to point so
it doesnt use any addressing).