NODE 6def1e73WH email petition.
J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>Tue, 1 Jun 93 19:35:53 PDT
In light of the White House getting on the net, how effective do you all think
an electronic petition, about the BigBrotherChip, would be? Do you think that
they would listen? Do you think that, perhapse, we would simply be put on a
list of "trouble makers?" I was thinking of writting a petition and
distributing it in every way I can think of, and encouraging people to send it
to the White House. Any comments?
+-----------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
| J. Michael Diehl ;-) | I thought I was wrong once. | PGP KEY |
| mdiehl@triton.unm.edu | But, I was mistaken. |available|
| mike.diehl@fido.org | | Ask Me! |
| (505) 299-2282 +-----------------------------+---------+
| |
+------"I'm just looking for the opportunity to be -------------+
| Politically Incorrect!" <Me> |
+-----If codes are outlawed, only criminals wil have codes.-----+
+----Is Big Brother in your phone? If you don't know, ask me---+
NODE b162ae2dWH email petition.
Eric Hughes <hughes@soda.berkeley.edu>Tue, 1 Jun 93 20:34:59 PDT
>In light of the White House getting on the net, how effective do you all think
>an electronic petition, about the BigBrotherChip, would be?
It appears that they are going to count responses and make totals pro
and con any particular issue that people write about. Thus while the
particulars of the petition don't really matter, the basic statements
against restrictions on encryption technology do.
I also heard no mention that they were going to do any kind of sorting
by person or email address. Thus it appears that you get to vote
early and often in this public opinion poll.
Heh, heh, heh.
Eric
NODE 3ce5d5e9Re: WH email petition.
J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>Tue, 1 Jun 93 23:12:47 PDT
> It appears that they are going to count responses and make totals pro
> and con any particular issue that people write about. Thus while the
> particulars of the petition don't really matter, the basic statements
> against restrictions on encryption technology do.
>
> I also heard no mention that they were going to do any kind of sorting
> by person or email address. Thus it appears that you get to vote
> early and often in this public opinion poll.
Do you think they'd TELL you that they were putting people on lists? Not
OUR government....
+-----------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
| J. Michael Diehl ;-) | I thought I was wrong once. | PGP KEY |
| mdiehl@triton.unm.edu | But, I was mistaken. |available|
| mike.diehl@fido.org | | Ask Me! |
| (505) 299-2282 +-----------------------------+---------+
| |
+------"I'm just looking for the opportunity to be -------------+
| Politically Incorrect!" <Me> |
+-----If codes are outlawed, only criminals wil have codes.-----+
+----Is Big Brother in your phone? If you don't know, ask me---+
NODE 416d2faeRe: WH email petition.
RYAN Alan Porter <ryan@rtfm.mlb.fl.us>Tue, 1 Jun 93 23:16:39 PDT
On Tue, 1 Jun 1993, J. Michael Diehl wrote:
> In light of the White House getting on the net, how effective do you all think
> an electronic petition, about the BigBrotherChip, would be? Do you think that
> they would listen? Do you think that, perhapse, we would simply be put on a
> list of "trouble makers?" I was thinking of writting a petition and
> distributing it in every way I can think of, and encouraging people to send it
> to the White House. Any comments?
A good idea, but it appears from the announcement that they are just going
to create a database of return addresses and subject lines and sit around
and read that instead of reading the actual messages.
In that case I would suggest a well written form letter that we could
encourage people to forward to the address with their names on it. That
way after they see the same subject line 12,000 times they might get the
slight urge to read the message going along with it. That would be kind
of equivalent to a petition.
Somebody good at slicking politicos like to draft a nice letter?
-Ryan
the Bit Wallah
NODE 6b77134aRe: WH email petition.
J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>Tue, 1 Jun 93 23:34:48 PDT
> A good idea, but it appears from the announcement that they are just going
> to create a database of return addresses and subject lines and sit around
> and read that instead of reading the actual messages.
>
> In that case I would suggest a well written form letter that we could
> encourage people to forward to the address with their names on it. That
> way after they see the same subject line 12,000 times they might get the
> slight urge to read the message going along with it. That would be kind
> of equivalent to a petition.
YES! I may have been unclear in my presentation, but this is what I had in
mind! Comments?
> Somebody good at slicking politicos like to draft a nice letter?
+-----------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
| J. Michael Diehl ;-) | I thought I was wrong once. | PGP KEY |
| mdiehl@triton.unm.edu | But, I was mistaken. |available|
| mike.diehl@fido.org | | Ask Me! |
| (505) 299-2282 +-----------------------------+---------+
| |
+------"I'm just looking for the opportunity to be -------------+
| Politically Incorrect!" <Me> |
+-----If codes are outlawed, only criminals wil have codes.-----+
+----Is Big Brother in your phone? If you don't know, ask me---+