NODE 5ff9f8f2Re: WH email petition.
dmandl@lehman.com (David Mandl)Wed, 2 Jun 93 06:07:06 PDT
> In general, petitions are a notoriously ineffective way to lobby.
> That's doubly so for email versions, for obvious reasons. Even
> without that problem, an electronic petition will (rightly) be ignored
> on the grounds that it represents the opinions of a small elite
> minority. With signatures collected in the streets and shopping malls
> of America, you have at least some chance of reaching a cross-section
> of people. But on the net? (And even if I'm wrong about the net's
> population, would they know it?)
> --Steve Bellovin
In general, I agree that petitions are a major waste of time and energy;
I'm also pretty convinced that this White House email link is a big scam.
Why are they any more likely to take your mail seriously just because it
comes over the phone lines and not in an envelope? Seems like a pretty
transparent PR ploy (also an attempt to make it seem like the White House
isn't a bunch of dinosaurs now that everybody and her nephew has an email
address).
But since it won't take much more than a couple of minutes of any of our
time, I can't see an electronic petition hurting our cause any--especially
because it'll certainly include the names of many esteemed professionals
and braniacs with fancy scientific, corporate, and academic credentials.
I think this could be a nice propaganda coup if it got publicised.
It could at the very least give a big black eye to the forces of evil.
--Dave.
NODE b65cd6bdRe: WH email petition.
J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>Wed, 2 Jun 93 16:29:19 PDT
According to David Mandl:
> In general, I agree that petitions are a major waste of time and energy;
> I'm also pretty convinced that this White House email link is a big scam.
> Why are they any more likely to take your mail seriously just because it
> comes over the phone lines and not in an envelope? Seems like a pretty
I don't, but as you mention below, it takes so little time, I thought we could
get people involved who may not otherwise give a damn. "It's so easy, just
send a quick letter, it will really help us out." Or something like that.
> transparent PR ploy (also an attempt to make it seem like the White House
> isn't a bunch of dinosaurs now that everybody and her nephew has an email
> address).
Well, we all know that! ;^)
> But since it won't take much more than a couple of minutes of any of our
> time, I can't see an electronic petition hurting our cause any--especially
> because it'll certainly include the names of many esteemed professionals
> and braniacs with fancy scientific, corporate, and academic credentials.
> I think this could be a nice propaganda coup if it got publicised.
How about each time we manage to get someone to send a letter to the WH, we also
request that they send it to one of us, so that we can keep track of it? Is
this doable accross the many networks?
> It could at the very least give a big black eye to the forces of evil.
'Hope so.
+-----------------------+-----------------------------+---------+
| J. Michael Diehl ;-) | I thought I was wrong once. | PGP KEY |
| mdiehl@triton.unm.edu | But, I was mistaken. |available|
| mike.diehl@fido.org | | Ask Me! |
| (505) 299-2282 +-----------------------------+---------+
| |
+------"I'm just looking for the opportunity to be -------------+
| Politically Incorrect!" <Me> |
+-----If codes are outlawed, only criminals wil have codes.-----+
+----Is Big Brother in your phone? If you don't know, ask me---+