Anonymous contact service

Uu> Maybe all penet users on the list should activate passwords on
 Uu> penet.fi.   Penet may search back along the chain of addresses for any
 Uu> familiar  address to check against it's list of password-enabled
 Uu> addresses.

Something is way screwy with Penet lately.  I have found that I have had
passwords required when I had no recollection of installing them.  On
top of this, I am unable to use the password provision due to header
grunging at the UUCP gate, in any case.
.   I have requested to admin@anon.penet.fi that the accounts by number
be deleted in order that I can start over with fresh accounts, & despite
three requests, this has not been done.  Bloody annoying, but I suppose
when we give Julf a big raise, _then_ I can start bitching, huh? 8-)
.   Speaking of related remailers, what is the status of Charcoal?

*********************************************************************
* <m..stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org> - PGP Key D30909 via servers *
* > What country can preserve its liberties if its rulers are not  <*
* > warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit <*
* > of resistance?  Let them take arms!" - Thomas Jefferson, 1787  <*
*********************************************************************

___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12
--  
M. Stirner - via FidoNet node 1:125/1
UUCP: ...!uunet!kumr!shelter!0!0!M..Stirner
INTERNET: M..Stirner@f0.n0.z1.FIDONET.ORG

Apologies for replying on the list....

> Something is way screwy with Penet lately.  I have found that I have had
> passwords required when I had no recollection of installing them.  On
> top of this, I am unable to use the password provision due to header
> grunging at the UUCP gate, in any case.
> .   I have requested to admin@anon.penet.fi that the accounts by number
> be deleted in order that I can start over with fresh accounts, & despite
> three requests, this has not been done.  Bloody annoying, but I suppose
> when we give Julf a big raise, _then_ I can start bitching, huh? 8-)

Here's why. I can't reply directly to your message, as some gateway on
the way barfs on the ".." in your name. This seems to come and go. This
is probably also what screws up anon.penet.fi.

> repl: bad addresses:
> 	"M. Stirner" <M..Stirner@f0.n0.z1.fidonet.org> -- no mailbox in
> local-part (.)

Another problem is that your address keeps changing. Thus you have
several ID's on anon.penet.fi, some with passwords, some without. Your
message was from m..stirner@f0.n0.z1.fidonet.org, but in your sinature
you claim you are also m..stirner@f28.n125.z1.fidonet.org (or
...!uunet!kumr!shelter!0!0!M..Stirner).

	Julf