NODE 33bd0f13Re: Disturbing statistics on wiretaps
"Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@shearson.com>Wed, 29 Sep 93 10:36:30 PDT
Mike Godwin says:
> Sec. 2515. Prohibition of use as evidence of intercepted wire or oral
> communications
>
> Whenever any wire or oral communication has been intercepted, no part of
> the contents of such communication and no evidence derived therefrom may
> be received in evidence in any trial, hearing, or other proceeding in or
> before any court, grand jury, department, officer, agency, regulatory
> body, legislative committee, or other authority of the United States, a
> State, or a political subdivision thereof if the disclosure of that
> information would be in violation of this chapter.
How does the statute define "wire" communication?
Perry
NODE 2d416ec6Re: Disturbing statistics on wiretaps
Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>Wed, 29 Sep 93 11:31:47 PDT
Perry writes:
> How does the statute define "wire" communication?
Sigh. I hate typing stuff in, but I'll go ahead and type this one
in.
Sec. 2510. Definitions
As used in this chapter--
(1) "wire communication" means any aural transfer made in whole or in part
through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by
the aid of wire, cable, or other like connection between the point of
origin and the point of reception (including the use of such connection in
a switching station) furnished or operated by any person engaged in
providing such facilities for the transmission of interstate or foreign
communications or communications affecting interstate or foreign commerce
and such term includes any electronic storage of such communication, but
such term does not include the radio portion of a cordless telephone
communication that is transmitted between the cordless telephone handset
and the base unit;....
-----
--Mike