NODE ae78627fHow about a pgp RFC...
Brad Huntting <huntting@glarp.com>Thu, 30 Sep 93 10:17:02 PDT
If you've followed the PEM working group in recent years, you may
have come to the conclusion as I have that it is not going anywhere,
and probably never will.
In an effort to make e-mail crypto more wide spread, I suggest we
draw up an internet-draft on the PGP message format, and the
algorithms used to send and receive messages.
At the moment I can think of nothing PEM can do that PGP cant.
Granted there are problems scaling the web-of-trust model, but PGP
is also capable of using a top down model (really just a subset of
the web model).
One thing such a draft is sure to do is send a clear signal to the
PEM group that they must either start swimming or sink.
brad
NODE 544bded5Re: How about a pgp RFC...
"Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>Thu, 30 Sep 93 10:46:37 PDT
Actually, an application type for MIME would seem to be more than
sufficient...
Perry
Brad Huntting says:
>
> If you've followed the PEM working group in recent years, you may
> have come to the conclusion as I have that it is not going anywhere,
> and probably never will.
>
> In an effort to make e-mail crypto more wide spread, I suggest we
> draw up an internet-draft on the PGP message format, and the
> algorithms used to send and receive messages.
>
> At the moment I can think of nothing PEM can do that PGP cant.
> Granted there are problems scaling the web-of-trust model, but PGP
> is also capable of using a top down model (really just a subset of
> the web model).
>
> One thing such a draft is sure to do is send a clear signal to the
> PEM group that they must either start swimming or sink.
>
>
> brad
NODE 2ec5b38eRe: How about a pgp RFC...
derek@cs.wisc.edu (Derek Zahn)Thu, 30 Sep 93 12:11:55 PDT
Perry Metzger:
> Actually, an application type for MIME would seem to be more than
> sufficient...
That's perfect!
type: application
subtype: pgp
The registration procedure is pretty simple. I'd be happy to
help work out a specification. If anybody tackles this,
with or without help, please let me (or us) know.
derek
NODE 3ed2fb19Re: How about a pgp RFC...
J. Michael Diehl <mdiehl@triton.unm.edu>Thu, 30 Sep 93 14:41:57 PDT
According to Brad Huntting:
>
> At the moment I can think of nothing PEM can do that PGP cant.
> Granted there are problems scaling the web-of-trust model, but PGP
> is also capable of using a top down model (really just a subset of
> the web model).
So where do I get PEM? I have pgp and ripem. Thanx in advance.
J. Michael Diehl ;^) |*The 2nd Amendment is there in case the
mdiehl@triton.unm.edu | Government forgets about the 1st! <RL>
Mike.Diehl@f29.n301.z1 |*God is a good Physicist, and an even
.fidonet.org | better Mathematician. <Me>
al945@cwns9.ins.cwru.edu|*I'm just looking for the opportunity to
(505) 299-2282 (voice) | be Politically Incorrect! <Me>
Can we impeach him yet? |*Protected by 18 USC 2511 and 18 USC 2703.
PGP Key = 7C06F1 = A6 27 E1 1D 5F B2 F2 F1 12 E7 53 2D 85 A2 10 5D