NODE 27ceac64Re: Signing our keys
paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)Thu, 28 Oct 93 11:08:08 PDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In an interesting list message, Wonderer wrote:
>It seems to me that we have an interesting dilemma
>here. If we are willing to sign a key based on an
>entity that we KNOW does not really exist, then what
>does a signature mean?
Here's a terrific example of one of the interesting differences
between the PEM-style key hierarchy and the PGP web.
Consider that any entity (real or spoofed) can own a key pair in
either model. A PEM key is bound to a particular identity by a
certificate. Right now, you can only get these certificates from
entities that want some concrete evidence of your True Name; this
makes sense, since the certificate establishes that key X belongs to
True Name Y.
PGP, OTOH, doesn't have any direct equivalent of a certificate. If I
get Wonderer's key with no signatures, I can't guarantee anything
about the association between that entity and the key I get.
If I get that same PGP key with signatures from Phil Karn and L. Detwiler,
I know that they're willing to certify the assocation. Does that mean
anything? Well, it depends on who the signers are :)
A set of PGP signatures can be equivalent to a PEM-style certificate;
that is, the set of signatures on a key, establishing that a
particular key belongs to a particular entity, can potentially be as
trustworthy as a certificate from Dun & Bradstreet or RSA.
The PGP feature that a key doesn't have to belong to the True Name of
an entity is a big plus in my book; otherwise, we'd have no Wonderer,
no deadbeat, and no S. Boxx.
- -Paul
- --
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG | Caution: cutting edge is sharp. Avoid contact.
Intergraph Federal Systems | Be a cryptography user - ask me how.
** Of course I don't speak for Intergraph. **
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3a
iQCVAgUBLNAJ2yA78To+806NAQF/DAQApsjQgIjW26GPvL2kINfCzTGyxn6zXJr9
OZVdLjPRe/J7eudxXfe5q7MlENxyomXgXqnUr5AxmTEjPzWCj63D1Yq2qr2Gcjq+
i7YTg8d9P+L+yTsTVUBk+ZIbBv+AFnD35yCEQnIC5nCE0kK644cpwa1FjDyLla01
2m4fvPNTOnM=
=ZF43
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE f75f2f22Signing our keys
hughes@ah.com (Eric Hughes)Thu, 28 Oct 93 11:48:08 PDT
>A PEM key is bound to a particular identity by a
>certificate. Right now, you can only get these certificates from
>entities that want some concrete evidence of your True Name
RSA is running a persona certificate server for PEM keys. They don't
ask for anything. Their latest brochure diagrams these as "anonymous
internet users." I don't know the address, but I do know that six
months ago it was running and being tested.
It would be interesting to know if such certificates worked in the new
Apple system 7. If so, there may soon be a whole flood of Mac-owning
pseudonyms using PEM.
Eric