NODE afdb8c42Re: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
"W. Kinney" <kinney@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>Sun, 24 Oct 93 10:33:10 PDT
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
What's the point of resorting to contrived inducements to include signatures?
If there's a real reason to do it, people will, and if not, they won't.
Perhaps we could just all by-and-large agree to sign posts? I'll start with
this one...
-- Will
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3
iQCVAgUBLMpmVvfv4TpIg2PxAQHrlAP5AaRssrPAO/sNsBkPVGKcJbn5z9exBlqd
JqG9nfx5HuinNFANovpGO5+zDp0fDtnQ4c1e86vsONQ3wSklXZx30IYG/h7cX4T9
rXNpxZVsT26lIHIrAxEXKBCRwhtlaO19+G1nN5DLChXF/DlnQiTRsmjxhPI1NI5r
9WyyI02GEDk=
=xy8S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE c1d8659bRe: ADMIN: proposed new policy on the mailing list
jpp@markv.comTue, 26 Oct 93 18:37:47 PDT
I personaly like this non-standard way to sign posts, cut out the
lines in the header, wrap them with the apropriate PGP gubbish, and
check it as a detached signature.
j'
--
O I am Jay Prime Positive jpp@markv.com
1250 bit key fingerprint = B8 95 E0 AF 9A A2 CD A5 89 C9 F0 FE B4 3A 2C 3F
524 bit key fingerprint = 8A 7C B9 F2 D5 46 4D ED 66 23 F1 71 DE FF 51 48
Public keys by `finger jpp@markv.com' or mail to pgp-public-keys@pgp.mit.edu
Your feedback is welcome, directly or via symbol JPP on hex@sea.east.sun.com