NODE 2f760612Re: Leisure Suit Larry
paul@poboy.b17c.ingr.com (Paul Robichaux)Mon, 18 Oct 93 13:27:15 PDT
In-Reply-To: <9310181910.AA23049@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>; from "Anonymous" at Oct 18, 93 2:10 pm
> Uh, its not "Lance," its "Larry" Detweiler, as in Leisure Suit
> Larry. (Sorry, Larry.)
Well, Dorothy Denning referred to "Larry Detwiler"'s comments on the
ITAR in the latest RISKS, which I don't have handy. I always thought
it was Lance.
Could there be more than one? Is "tcmay" also posing as one of the L.
Detwilers? Are we being pseudospoofed? Maybe someone should call Dan
Rather.
--
Paul Robichaux, KD4JZG | "Change the world for a better tomorrow. But
perobich@ingr.com | watch your ass today." - aaron@halcyon.com
Intergraph Federal Systems | Be a cryptography user- ask me how.
NODE 339f2540Dan Rather, et al. (WAS: Leisure Suit Larry)
ferguson@icm1.icp.net (Paul Ferguson x2044)Mon, 18 Oct 93 15:12:30 PDT
> > Uh, its not "Lance," its "Larry" Detweiler, as in Leisure Suit
> > Larry. (Sorry, Larry.)
>
> Well, Dorothy Denning referred to "Larry Detwiler"'s comments on the
> ITAR in the latest RISKS, which I don't have handy. I always thought
> it was Lance.
>
> Could there be more than one? Is "tcmay" also posing as one of the L.
> Detwilers? Are we being pseudospoofed? Maybe someone should call Dan
> Rather.
I've been sitting back, watching the signal-to-noise on the list
fluctuate with a smidgeon of a grin on my face.
"Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain!"
Personally, I think that the list is just going through a few minor
changes, the worst of which are new people checking into "something that
they had heard about."
Face it -- the net grows a bit more "open" every day.
As far as Dan Rather goes, I'd bet he wouldn't even understand.
,-)
Cheers,
_____________________________________________________________________________
Paul Ferguson
Mindbank Consulting Group fergp@sytex.com
Fairfax, Virginia USA ferguson@icp.net
NODE d965f2b2Re: Dan Rather, et al. (WAS: Leisure Suit Larry)
nate@VIS.ColoState.EDUMon, 18 Oct 93 17:47:19 PDT
writes Paul Ferguson x2044:
>
>Personally, I think that the list is just going through a few minor
>changes, the worst of which are new people checking into "something that
>they had heard about."
>
>Face it -- the net grows a bit more "open" every day.
>
The WIRED article helped with this, I am sure... there's a LOT of kids out
there on the net who just post to things for the hell of it, and seeing
refs in magazine like WIRED certainly helps!
-nate
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Nate Sammons email: nate@VIS.ColoState.Edu
| Colorado State University Computer Visualization Laboratory
| Finger nate@monet.VIS.ColoState.Edu for my PGP key
| #include <std.disclaimer>
| Title 18 USC 2511 and 18 USC 2703 Protected --> Monitoring Forbidden
+--------+ Always remember "Brazil"