NODE fd8007d3Re: distributed autonomous networks
wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (Bill_Stewart_HOY002_1305)Fri, 8 Oct 93 17:05:48 PDT
Obviously, if we do a radio solution, the equipment ought to be attached
to cans marked W.A.S.T.E :-)
At least in the US, you don't have to pirate radio frequencies;
there are a few bands that are available for uncensored low-power use,
though some of them may require spread-spectrum.
Meteor Burst is real stuff, though the last time I knew a little about it
the bandwidth was pretty low; e.g. you got 300 baud average throughput
doing bursts of 4800 baud with really heavy-duty forward error correction,
since it's a pretty sporadic medium. Power usage is really low,
and typical applications are things like telemetry from snow-depth recorders
out in the mountains, where line-of-sight is essentially unavailable.
I don't know how much bandwidth or area you get out of it, or how traceable
it is - our meteor expert retired years ago, and was looking at problems like
how to build radio data networks that weren't bothered by nuclear explosions.
If there's a spare satellite slot available, ALOHANET technology is a reasonably
efficient way to use it.
NODE 2d59bffbRe: distributed autonomous networks
hiscdcj@lux.latrobe.edu.au (Dwayne)Tue, 12 Oct 93 07:26:28 PDT
>Meteor Burst is real stuff, though the last time I knew a little about it
>the bandwidth was pretty low; e.g. you got 300 baud average throughput
>doing bursts of 4800 baud with really heavy-duty forward error correction,
Hmm, not much use unless you had some sort of massivley parallel setup.
Still, it's an idea.
>since it's a pretty sporadic medium. Power usage is really low,
>and typical applications are things like telemetry from snow-depth recorders
>out in the mountains, where line-of-sight is essentially unavailable.
Yes, but I assume that we are talking about moving a bit more data than this.
>I don't know how much bandwidth or area you get out of it, or how traceable
>it is - our meteor expert retired years ago, and was looking at problems like
>how to build radio data networks that weren't bothered by nuclear explosions.
I don't think the Powers That Be will get _that_ heavy... :-)
>If there's a spare satellite slot available, ALOHANET technology is a reasonably
>efficient way to use it.
Err, which is?
Dwayne.