// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Should we oppose the

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 2d40f78aRe: Should we oppose the
You ask, "why have telecoms prices been declining for years?" and cite
overseas calls as an example.  In fact, the actual cost of local service has
gone up over 240% since deregulation, according to a detailed research
report a friend of mine is about to publish.
NODE 6828db9fRe: Telecom deregulation
"George A. Gleason" <gg@well.sf.ca.us> wrote:

> You ask, "why have telecoms prices been declining for years?" and cite
> overseas calls as an example.  In fact, the actual cost of local service has
> gone up over 240% since deregulation, according to a detailed research
> report a friend of mine is about to publish.  

Please tell me you're not that stupid.  The local companies haven't been
deregulated.  Only the long distance has been somewhat deregulated,
while the local companies still enjoy a monopoly.  Think about
it...sheez...
NODE 1042ef4dRe: Should we oppose the
"George A. Gleason" says:
> You ask, "why have telecoms prices been declining for years?" and cite
> overseas calls as an example.  In fact, the actual cost of local service has
> gone up over 240% since deregulation, according to a detailed research
> report a friend of mine is about to publish.  

What has happened is that the price the consumer sees has gone up.
AT&T used to subsidize local service with long distance service --
this cross subsidy has ended. Local service is not deregulated
anywhere in the U.S., so your friend's study is meaningless.

Long distance prices have dropped dramatically, even taking subsidy
elimination into account. Competition works, George. Fabian socialism
is what doesn't.

Perry