NODE 82caf482Digicash question
bdolan <71431.2564@CompuServe.COM>Mon, 6 Dec 93 13:20:08 PST
TO: >internet: cypherpunks@toad.com
Forgive me for a newbie question. Why wouldn't the following inelegant
idea work?
X gives $101 to First Digital Bank, which gives X a PGP-signed password
representing a claim on $100 (or maybe they would do this just for the
"float"). X gives the $100 password to Y, in exchange for a narco-terrorism
decoder ring. Y, being a cautious soul, calls First DigiBank immediately
and gives it the password. DigiBank pockets $1 and issues Y a new signed
password good for $99. Note that DigiBank (1) doesn't need to know who Y
is and (2) ensures that a given money-password is only spent once. By the
same method, Y can pay Z and Z can deposit the credit in BillnHill's S&L for
settlement. Or the money can keep floating around until DigiBank gets it
all, which is what usually happens now ;-)
Of course, you have to trust the bank - but you have to now, also.
Don't abuse me too much. Just point me to the right FAQ (...cowering...)
bdolan@well.sf.ca.us
NODE ac79ea5bRe: Digicash question
Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>Mon, 6 Dec 93 13:53:21 PST
Well, there are a couple of problems, but I'll only ask about one: How
do you make sure that the bank doesn't earmark the "password" with X's
name? You don't want the bank to know that that "password" was given
to X.
-derek