NODE 37130790Gun conversion info banne
Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>Mon, 21 Feb 94 15:44:34 PST
M >Has this law ever been challenged in court? I doubt if it would stand
M >up, as long as the books are written as "here's how one would..."
M >rather than actively encouraging you to do it. Technical information
M >cannot be banned, as long as you aren't inciting violence.
M >
M >--- Mike
Sorry I'm years behind in my list reading...
Mike, recall the precedents. FDA burning of Reich's books in the '50s as
"labeling for an unlawful medical device" -- the Orgone Accumulator.
Likewise FDA seizures of Scientolgy literature in the '60s as "labeling
for an unlawful medical device" -- E-meters. Then there are the moves
against vitamin literature in recent FDA raids. I don't think the courts
have ever faced the specific issue of regulatory censorship.
DCF
Then there's the time in the early '80s when the Consumer Products Safety
Commission banned the "Button Book."
--- WinQwk 2.0b#1165
NODE 773824a3Re: Gun conversion info banne
Mike Godwin <mnemonic@eff.org>Mon, 21 Feb 94 17:08:04 PST
Duncan writes:
> "labeling for an unlawful medical device" -- the Orgone Accumulator.
> Likewise FDA seizures of Scientolgy literature in the '60s as "labeling
> for an unlawful medical device" -- E-meters. Then there are the moves
> against vitamin literature in recent FDA raids. I don't think the courts
> have ever faced the specific issue of regulatory censorship.
>
These cases are pre-Brandenburg v. Ohio. In Brandenburg, the Supreme Court
held that mere advocacy of illegal conduct is Constitutionally protected.
--Mike
NODE 2c1cbea4Gun conversion info banne
solovay@math.berkeley.edu (Robert M. Solovay)Mon, 21 Feb 94 21:23:03 PST
Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com> writes:
Then there's the time in the early '80s when the Consumer Products Safety
Commission banned the "Button Book."
Query:
What pray is the "Button Book".