// COMPLETE THREAD

Detweiler remailer abuse

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE fe8a9b49Detweiler remailer abuse
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

I can't take life seriously enough to censor old Larry.
I can't take the IDEAL of the First Amendment lightly
enough to do so either. And afterall, he wasn't the
one who wrote that "Blacknet" blurb. I find it amusing
to see uptight fuck-wads from specialized narrow minded
Usenet groups yelling about someone sending something to
their precious little group that upset them. Abuse away
Larry. Show us that we really DO need dumb optical fibers
between laptops instead of this tight-assed RFC standardized
World Wide Wiretap we call our playground. We need a new
net guys.

 -=Xenon=- <qwerty@netcom.com>


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.3

iQCVAgUBLWA4nQSzG6zrQn1RAQE1ygQAhOXiq/M11xIMNHxfdQUjgC+qBtWVx6IL
WklpjXroNgb2mc4Xjqh2i/Pw4PZ39ecZYsdeIs7BViWw3FuAE+GAvqCAL8+tI5Hv
Il5NxyNj/k8NqRhZY9YjWv7zzFZ9VKl1ifj4/eScEKcF6ZkbyaCrUAVJTXkJlcyx
nTRfsFFYFLA=
=Fbyt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE 81b9ee68Re: Detweiler remailer abuse
Xenon says:
> I can't take life seriously enough to censor old Larry.
> I can't take the IDEAL of the First Amendment lightly
> enough to do so either.

The first amendment says nothing about private individuals -- its
about the government. It says that the GOVERNMENT can't stop people
from speaking. Tell me, if Larry wanted to stand next to your bed and
shout all night long, would you let him in in order to uphold the
"first amendment"?

Individuals may choose how they wish to let their resources be used.
In your case, you may decide that you don't want to deal with Larry
using your equipment in an effort to destroy you. After all, you may
be the guy who gets jailed on kiddy-porn charges because Larry decides
to target YOU first. He isn't a responsible net.citizen, and he
doesn't deserve to be treated that way.

Perry