NODE 2840f342Re: "ordinary public"
wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)Sun, 13 Mar 94 00:00:27 PST
> rishab@dxm.ernet.in writes:
> > It's not a good idea to take this debate to the ordinary public...
> > Time readers, yes...
>
> Well, if "Time readers" aren't the ordinary public, then I give up.
Well, they're a subset of the ordinary public that both reads and
has some interest in news issues, but that's a reasonably good start.
The folks who only watch TV are a bit different audience,
and the folks who don't care about news are less likely to vote...