// COMPLETE THREAD

spooks

3 expanded posts · every known parent and child

NODE ad952671spooks fhalper@pilot.njin.net (Frederic Halper)Thu, 3 Mar 94 08:29:15 PST

If there are any spooks on this list aren't they required by law to say that 
they are if somoeon asked if anyone on on th list was employed by CIA, DOD, FBI
or NSA?
Reuben Halper

NODE 9ca2bef9Re: spooks jdwilson@gold.chem.hawaii.edu (Jim Wilson (VA))Sun, 6 Mar 94 18:58:38 PST

> 
> If there are any spooks on this list aren't they required by law to say that 
> they are if somoeon asked if anyone on on th list was employed by CIA, DOD, FBI
> or NSA?
> Reuben Halper
> 
If undercover police can tell you that they are not a cop and then arrest you
without your being able to claim entrapment, why should the three letter
agency agents be compelled to do so by law?  (Not an arguement in favor of this
but a question as to what law would require this.)

-Jim

NODE 05dc64d0Re: spooks "Perry E. Metzger" <pmetzger@lehman.com>Thu, 3 Mar 94 08:53:45 PST

Frederic Halper says:
> If there are any spooks on this list aren't they required by law to
> say that they are if somoeon asked if anyone on on th list was
> employed by CIA, DOD, FBI or NSA?

No.

Where did you get such an idea?

.pm