// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Why Digital Cash is Not Being Used

5 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 67468fb7Re: Why Digital Cash is Not Being Used
Michael V. Caprio Jr. asks:

> So what is the natural currency to trade in on the Internet?

Instead of charging for information, charge for time.  You lose  
control of the information you sell, but you never lose control of  
the time you sell.  People with spare time could perform services in  
exchange for Tacky Tokens.  These Tacky Token could then be exchanged  
for services performed by other people.  What kinds of services?   
Whatever people don't have time to do themselves.

Jim_Miller@suite.com
NODE dcdff44bRe: Why Digital Cash is Not Being Used
Jim Miller says:
> 
> Michael V. Caprio Jr. asks:
> 
> > So what is the natural currency to trade in on the Internet?
> 
> Instead of charging for information, charge for time.  You lose  
> control of the information you sell, but you never lose control of  
> the time you sell.  People with spare time could perform services in  
> exchange for Tacky Tokens.

Currency needs to be fungible -- your time and my time and the time of
a brain surgeon are not the same. Furthermore, I can't verify that you
are actually giving me your time. It would be a nightmare.

The natural currency today is the U.S. Dollar, as transfered via
digicash.

Perry
NODE 08325a10Re: Why Digital Cash is Not Being Used
C'punks,

Perry wrote:

> . . .
> The natural currency today is the U.S. Dollar, as transfered via
> digicash.

BINGO.  Other national currencies have a place as well, but the US dollar 
is the de facto currency for international transactions.


 S a n d y
NODE d6cec59aRe: Why Digital Cash is Not Being Used
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@snark.imsi.com>

   Jim Miller says:
   > 
   > Michael V. Caprio Jr. asks:
   > 
   > > So what is the natural currency to trade in on the Internet?
   > 

   ...

   The natural currency today is the U.S. Dollar, as transfered via
   digicash.

   Perry

It seems that ciphercash schemes, aka banks, might have cash deposits
to invest. The interest on these investments might help cover the
transaction costs. The value of the ciphercash might ought to be able
to rise and fall (slightly, perhaps dramatically occassionally) with
the performance of these investments.

How about a floating cipherdollar? Holders of cipherdollars would
share in the proceeds of the investment, minus real transaction costs
and overhead, plus transaction fees if any.  How much they were worth
would depend on how long they were kept, the fee structure, etc.

In other words, I'm saying that it might be easier to let the value
float slightly (with a current, published conversion rate into the
currency of your choice) than to peg it exactly at any particular
value. If it turns out that a lot of people buy the things and keep
them for a long time, it would be nice for them to increase in value
(compared to our friend the US $) as a hedge against inflation.

Of course, I'm merely suggesting competent money management here by
the bank, not that anyone (except cypherzealots, of course) would
deliberately invest this way. Sort of like interest on your checking
account.

A similar (more radical) scheme would equate one cipherbuck == one
share of stock in the cyberbank, redeemable at whatever the stock
is currently selling for (approximately).

I might like safeguards of some sort, if feasible, to prevent the
bank officers from absconding with the loot...

-- 
dat@ebt.com (David Taffs)
NODE 2ba38740Re: Why Digital Cash is Not Being Used
David Taffs says:
>    From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@snark.imsi.com>
>    The natural currency today is the U.S. Dollar, as transfered via
>    digicash.
> 
> How about a floating cipherdollar? Holders of cipherdollars would
> share in the proceeds of the investment, minus real transaction costs
> and overhead, plus transaction fees if any.

Basically, you have now combined a mutual fund with a currency, which
causes great trouble for anyone who would like to use the one without
the other.

Its true that transaction costs are often paid for implicitly by banks
lowering the interest that they pay you. However, thats a different
question.

I'd like to emphasize that Digicash is a TRANSACTION MECHANISM.
Digital cash is NOT a currency. There is no need to invent a new kind
of money -- there are already too many for the world's good as it is.
Digicash can admittedly be used to transfer shares in cattle farms as
easily as Dollars, but far more groceries take Dollars.

Perry