NODE 51ee34d8Re: Restoring the list membership
gtoal@an-teallach.com (Graham Toal)Fri, 20 May 94 08:05:54 PDT
: I'll wait for two days in case anyone on this list has strong objections to
: returning the membership to status quo ante. If not, I'll send the form letter.
I think it was an excellent opportunity to cull the dead wood. How about
instead of resubbing all 500+, you just send them all a mail telling them
what happened and how to resub. That way we only get the interested ones
back...
G
NODE 18663c84Re: Restoring the list membership
Jeff Davis <eagle@deeptht.armory.com>Fri, 20 May 94 08:12:52 PDT
> : I'll wait for two days in case anyone on this list has strong objections to
> : returning the membership to status quo ante. If not, I'll send the form letter.
>
> I think it was an excellent opportunity to cull the dead wood. How about
> instead of resubbing all 500+, you just send them all a mail telling them
> what happened and how to resub. That way we only get the interested ones
> back...
What Graham said...
--
PGP PUBLIC KEY via finger! JAFEFFM Speaking & Thinking For Myself!
* eagle@deeptht.armory.com email info@eff.org *
*** O U T L A W S On The E L E C T R O N I C F R O N T I E R ****
***** Committed to Free Public Internet Access for World Peace *****
NODE fde93403Re: Restoring the list membership
bart@netcom.com (Harry Bartholomew)Fri, 20 May 94 08:37:35 PDT
>
> : I'll wait for two days in case anyone on this list has strong objections to
> : returning the membership to status quo ante. If not, I'll send the form letter.
>
> I think it was an excellent opportunity to cull the dead wood. How about
> instead of resubbing all 500+, you just send them all a mail telling them
> what happened and how to resub. That way we only get the interested ones
> back...
>
> G
I think that is exactly what was proposed. Besides I can't quite
imagine someone who is uninterested getting 50 messages per day
and not unsubscribing!