// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Restoring the list membership

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE 51ee34d8Re: Restoring the list membership
: I'll wait for two days in case anyone on this list has strong objections to
: returning the membership to status quo ante. If not, I'll send the form letter.

I think it was an excellent opportunity to cull the dead wood.  How about
instead of resubbing all 500+, you just send them all a mail telling them
what happened and how to resub.  That way we only get the interested ones
back...

G
NODE 18663c84Re: Restoring the list membership
> : I'll wait for two days in case anyone on this list has strong objections to
> : returning the membership to status quo ante. If not, I'll send the form letter.
> 
> I think it was an excellent opportunity to cull the dead wood.  How about
> instead of resubbing all 500+, you just send them all a mail telling them
> what happened and how to resub.  That way we only get the interested ones
> back...
 
What Graham said...  
-- 
PGP PUBLIC KEY via finger!  JAFEFFM  Speaking & Thinking For Myself!
 
* eagle@deeptht.armory.com			email info@eff.org *
*** O U T L A W S  On The  E L E C T R O N I C  F R O N T I E R ****
***** Committed to Free Public Internet Access for World Peace *****
NODE fde93403Re: Restoring the list membership
> 
> : I'll wait for two days in case anyone on this list has strong objections to
> : returning the membership to status quo ante. If not, I'll send the form letter.
> 
> I think it was an excellent opportunity to cull the dead wood.  How about
> instead of resubbing all 500+, you just send them all a mail telling them
> what happened and how to resub.  That way we only get the interested ones
> back...
> 
> G
    I think that is exactly what was proposed.  Besides I can't quite
    imagine someone who is uninterested getting 50 messages per day
    and not unsubscribing!