No Subject

frissell@panix.com writes:

> "Dead White European Males didn't have World Domination handed them on a 
> silver platter.  They had to *earn* it.  When they started out, they were 
> blue-painted savages living in a cold, underpopulated territory far 
> removed from the centers of civilization in the Mediterranean and Arab 
> worlds.
> 
> We could give up this power to various whining dregs of humanity without a 
> fight but that would be unfair to them.  'What we achieve too easily we 
> esteem too lightly' etc.  I'm afraid you all are going to have to work for 
> a living.

Or, of course, we could shoot you.

Anonymous says:
> frissell@panix.com writes:
> > "Dead White European Males didn't have World Domination handed them on a 
> > silver platter.  They had to *earn* it.  When they started out, they were 
> > blue-painted savages living in a cold, underpopulated territory far 
> > removed from the centers of civilization in the Mediterranean and Arab 
> > worlds.
> > 
> > We could give up this power to various whining dregs of humanity without a 
> > fight but that would be unfair to them.  'What we achieve too easily we 
> > esteem too lightly' etc.  I'm afraid you all are going to have to work for 
> > a living.
> 
> Or, of course, we could shoot you.

Duncan is likely a far better shot. Most obsolete white male
oppressors of the proletariat have that in their favor. However, this
is going afield of cryptography.

On Wed, 18 May 1994, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> 
> Anonymous says:
> > frissell@panix.com writes:
> > > "Dead White European Males didn't have World Domination handed them on a 
> > > silver platter.  They had to *earn* it.  When they started out, they were 
> > 
> > Or, of course, we could shoot you.
> 
> Duncan is likely a far better shot. Most obsolete white male
> oppressors of the proletariat have that in their favor. However, this
> is going afield of cryptography.

No this is directly related.  I was watching the National Commie 
Television special on freedom last night to catch John Perry Barlow's 
excellent piece (clearly the best segmant) and had to sit through some 
whining persons who clearly felt that they were members of inferior 
genders or ethnic groups because they felt unable to take it when people 
said unkind things about them.  Their response was to complain.  It got 
my dander up.

In addition, the nets give us an opportunity to ignore people who can't 
handle independent existence.  They can stew in their pots and we can 
stew in ours.  We don't have to bother ourselves about their trying to 
rule us.

"They have whined for their rights.  We shall give them more than they 
ask for.  We shall give them justice."

DCF

Date: Wed, 18 May 1994 13:27:28 -0400 (EDT)
    From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
    
    No this is directly related.

No, really, it's not.  Please take it to alt.bigots.proud or whatever.

			Zeke - originally WASP, dropped the religious part.
			       Also, straight, right-handed and male
			       in case it matters to you.

Ezekial Palmer says:
>     Date: Wed, 18 May 1994 13:27:28 -0400 (EDT)
>     From: Duncan Frissell <frissell@panix.com>
>     
>     No this is directly related.
> 
> No, really, it's not.  Please take it to alt.bigots.proud or whatever.

It may be related or unrelated, but I will testify that Duncan is not
a bigot. He's merely not a reverse-bigot or a person without opinions
on what way of running a society is best.

My opinion is, however, that this discussion has no real function on
this list.

Perry

Anonymous scripsit
> 
> frissell@panix.com writes:
> 
> > "Dead White European Males didn't have World Domination handed them on a 
> > silver platter.  They had to *earn* it.  When they started out, they were 
> > blue-painted savages living in a cold, underpopulated territory far 
> > removed from the centers of civilization in the Mediterranean and Arab 
> > worlds.
> > 
> > We could give up this power to various whining dregs of humanity without a 
> > fight but that would be unfair to them.  'What we achieve too easily we 
> > esteem too lightly' etc.  I'm afraid you all are going to have to work for 
> > a living.
> 
> Or, of course, we could shoot you.
> 
 
I think you fail to understand how much work this entails.


-- 
073BB885A786F666 nemo repente fuit turpissimus - potestas scientiae in usu est
6E6D4506F6EDBC17 quaere verum ad infinitum, loquitur sub rosa    -    wichtig!

On Wed, 18 May 1994, Anonymous wrote:

> Or, of course, we could shoot you.
> 

You're welcome to try.  Worked for *us*.

DCF

"Live White European Male (and maybe even in part an anglo-saxon protestant).

C'punks,

On Wed, 18 May 1994, Anonymous wrote:

> frissell@panix.com writes:
> 
> > . . .
> > We could give up this power to various whining dregs of humanity without a 
> > fight but that would be unfair to them.  'What we achieve too easily we 
> > esteem too lightly' etc.  I'm afraid you all are going to have to work for 
> > a living.
> 
> Or, of course, we could shoot you.

You could try, but history suggests we're much better shots.


 S a n d y