Re: To anon remailer operators...

> Perhaps you might block their many addresses, or put general size
> and number of post limits on the remailers.
> 
> G
> PS Someone has already used some sort of anon remailer at anon.spies.
> wiretap.com to forge an article apparently *from* C&S to one of the
> porn groups.  Anyone know anything about that remailer?
> 

: I am in favor of blocking mail to the c+s addresses.

You'll need this:

        cslaw@delphi.com
        cslaw@win.net
        cslaw@witchcraft.com
        cslaw@pipeline.com
        cslaw@netcom.com
        cslaw@indirect.com       (currently disabled)
        nike@indirect.com        (currently disabled)
        lcanter@delphi.com
        lcanter@win.net
        lcanter@witchcraft.com
        lcanter@pipeline.com
        lcanter@indirect.com     (currently disabled)
        76636.443@compuserve.com        L. Canter
        73032.164@compuserve.com        M. Siegel
        cslaw@lcanter.win.net
        cslaw@msiegel.win.net
        cslaw@win.net
        *@pericles.com           (Their own new direct host)

I may have missed some.  They pop up *all over* the place :-(

G

nOn Sat, 14 May 1994, Graham Toal wrote:

[...multiple dirtbag lawyer addressed deleted...]

> I may have missed some.  They pop up *all over* the place :-(

Sorta like roaches.  Hmm.  A fitting analogy

____        Robert A. Hayden          <=> hayden@krypton.mankato.msus.edu
\  /__          -=-=-=-=-             <=>          -=-=-=-=-
 \/  /   Finger for Geek Code Info    <=> Political Correctness is
   \/  Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> P.C. for "Thought Police"
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
(GEEK CODE 1.0.1)  GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++
		       n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)

> You'll need this:
> 

	Wow.. that's quite a sizeable number.

	Regarding pericles.com -- I don't have anything against
mailbombing that site -- it's their own host, they pay for the disk
space and their feed right? Mailbombing them on other sites will make
it bad for the owners of the site and the other users of the site who
aren't involved with the crap. . . Should probably still stop mail
from the remailers though to avoid gettings sued.

	A class actions suit against c+s on the part of the usenet
might be a good idea. (But this is a topic for alt.net-abuse.)