NODE 12a76851Regarding Mr. Nalbandian's Comments (fwd)
lassie!jim%lassie@netcom.com (Jim Nalbandian)Fri, 6 May 94 03:37:20 PDT
[1] If Joe ComputerUser does not know how to use his computer for more
than word processing and playing games, at this point, he probably doesn't
NEED PGP. If he knows enough to realize what little privacy he actually
has, he will go looking for security. With luck, he will run into someone
who can steer him towards PGP...
Wow, word processer, so i guess that if you are just using a word
processer that you don't need PGP? As usual you distance yourself
from computer users by placing youself on a pedistal above them.
Why is that? Do you feel superior to them? Is it something that
was lacking in your childhood? I bet you could code 500 lines a day
when you were in grade school. I bet you never have just used a
word processer or played games on a computer? Have you? With luck
somebody will give me the winning numbers to the lottery next
week, too. And with wings pigs can fly.
[2] The purpose of this list is not to insure that everyone has a copy and
knows how to use PGP (though most of us would consider that a worthwhile
goal). As it has been said more and more often, 'Cypherpunks write CODE!'.
This is a discussion group about the practicality and implementation of
specific forms of cryptography and cryptographic applications (digital
money, key servers, etc). [ This is not to belittle the political
content of the group, though. ] Groups like the EFF are interested in
helping new users to the Internet learn all about it, and are doing a good
job of it so far. If you are that concerned about the masses not knowing about
cryptography, try sending a note to the EFF (with the caps lock OFF!) and
ask them to include a section on privacy, cryptography and PGP in the next
version of the Big Dummy's Guide To The Internet. It's a start.
Why should I waste my time? You waste your time by writing crypto
that WILL be outlawed and take no action to distribute. And as
usual people on here can't see farther than Internet. They really
can'nt. Must be a pedistal thing. Why write crypto or even purport
it's use if you are to deprive the real people that could aid your
cause the use use of "PGP" or other sutible non-CLIPPER
cryptography. More people are off Internet than on.?
[3] Sending badly composed rants to seven hundred people and then
publically posting a response to a private message is not the way to be
taken seriously.
I thought there was only a couple hundred on this list? cool 700! I
have no idea what you mean by public post of private message?
--
* Spelling errors are intentional and international *
Jim Nalbandian netcomsv!lassie!jim%lassie@netcom.com
Tempe, Arizona, USA N7SZS@K7BUC.AZ.US.NA
No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest
reason for the people to retain there right to keep and bear arms
is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in
government. <-------- Thomas Jefferson --
NODE a40d9aacRe: Regarding Mr. Nalbandian's Comments (fwd)
Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>Fri, 6 May 94 09:12:12 PDT
C'punks,
An open letter to Jim Nalbandian:
Dear Asshole,
This will be my last communications to you (unless you apologize to this
list, that is). You are not worth any more of my time.
You complain that we "elitists" aren't making strong crypto available to
the great unwashed. Bullshit. We are and you *aren't*.
I have written an article about PGP for Future Sex magazine. I ghosted a
similar article and assisted in research on another for a financial
privacy newsletter that targets conservative, wealthy doctors and
businessmen. I am writing yet another crypto article for Soldier of
Fortune. These are in addition to relevant articles I have written for
Mondo 2000 and Wired. All these article gave or will give information
about how to get PGP on a disk through the mail, in addition to FTP sites.
On the other hand, Mr. power-to-the-people jailbird, it looks as though you
haven't done diddly squat. Cypherpunks write code and take other actions
to promote strong crypto. You want to be a Cypherpunk? Climb down out
of the pulpit and lend a hand. Otherwise, shut the fuck up.
Kindest regards,
S a n d y
NODE 0db0bd8cR the best policy
D.C. Williams <dcwill@ee.unr.edu>Fri, 6 May 94 14:47:52 PDT
>
> An open letter to *******:
>
> Dear Asshole,
You play directly into his hands with this. Attention is what he craves.
The First Amendment might give him the right to blather on, but it
doesn't require anybody to listen to him. If we ignore him, he'll lose
interest and migrate to alt.flame.
=D.C.