Re: PGP 2.6 is dangerous in the long term ?

Russell Nelson writes:

[quoting someone:]
>   I asked Jim Bidzos about this last year.  He told me they're planning
>   on becoming a supplier of cryptography code and expertise.

>If they had expertise, they wouldn't need patents.

Come on - fine, I don't like that patent (not that it affects me very
badly), but where do you think they got the name RSADSI from?

Conrad