NODE 309bf421Re: more info from talk at MIT yesterday.
wcs@anchor.ho.att.com (bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204)Fri, 3 Jun 94 09:02:51 PDT
> Bill Sommerfeld says:
> > They also had a comment that they considered Blaze's findings to be
> > mostly irrelevant, as the only people who would use it would be
> > persons who *didn't* trust the escrow system, but *did* trust the
> > algorithm...
Defense Messaging System is supposedly going to use Skipjack,
so I assume it's reasonably secure - and if there *are*
NSA-only backdoors in the algorithm, at least they won't
be admitting it to your neighbor hood cops and FBI wiretappers,
so you'd have to be an *interesting* suspect to get cracked.
Bill
NODE cf8da174Re: more info from talk at MIT yesterday.
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>Fri, 3 Jun 94 09:24:33 PDT
bill.stewart@pleasantonca.ncr.com +1-510-484-6204 says:
> Defense Messaging System is supposedly going to use Skipjack,
> so I assume it's reasonably secure - and if there *are*
> NSA-only backdoors in the algorithm, at least they won't
> be admitting it to your neighbor hood cops and FBI wiretappers,
> so you'd have to be an *interesting* suspect to get cracked.
Indeed -- let us recall that Coventry was bombed into ruins rather
than reveal that the Brits could read German codes in WWII.
Perry