NODE 5798c792Is the NSA really competent?
catalyst-remailer@netcom.comSun, 26 Jun 94 23:51:24 PDT
Here are the biggest breakthroughs in cryptography during the period
when the NSA has been the purported leader in the field, and
has enjoyed by far the largest budget:
public key: Diffie, Hellman, Merkle, R.,S., A., etc.
key escrow: Micali (and the current NSA/NIST scheme has all
the earmarks of being thrown on top of Skipjack at
the last moment, after Micali had published, and
perhaps even after Denning had discussed it).
DES: IBM
Skipjack: probably just a modified DES
IDEA: Swiss
Also zero-knowledge proofs, blind signatures, oblivious
transfer, BBS, and other recent advances were all discovered
outside the NSA.
For all their vaunted competence, for all the mathematicians
they have been alleged to employ, despite having a cryptography
budget orders of magnitude larger than any other Western
crypto group, it looks like the NSA contribued to _none_ of
the major advances in cryptography that occured during its zenith.
NODE cc844a03Re: Is the NSA really competent?
"Christian D. Odhner" <cdodhner@indirect.com>Mon, 27 Jun 94 00:03:45 PDT
On Sun, 26 Jun 1994 catalyst-remailer@netcom.com wrote:
> Skipjack: probably just a modified DES
[stuff deleted...]
> crypto group, it looks like the NSA contribued to _none_ of
^^^^^^
> the major advances in cryptography that occured during its zenith.
If skipjack is really a 'major advance' (I won't state an opinion at this
point) then it seems that they did indeed contribute to a major advance.
At least one. Also if I remember my history right they had a lot to do
with the original redesigning of the s-boxes in des.
Happy Hunting, -Chris.
______________________________________________________________________________
Christian Douglas Odhner | "The NSA can have my secret key when they pry
cdodhner@indirect.com | it from my cold, dead, hands... But they shall
pgp 2.3 public key by finger | NEVER have the password it's encrypted with!"
cypherpunks WOw dCD Traskcom Team Stupid
Key fingerprint = 58 62 A2 84 FD 4F 56 38 82 69 6F 08 E4 F1 79 11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NODE 62457975Re: Is the NSA really competent?
nelson@crynwr.com (Russell Nelson)Mon, 27 Jun 94 06:13:35 PDT
crypto group, it looks like the NSA contribued to _none_ of
the major advances in cryptography that occured during its zenith.
Exactly. It's not the NSA's job to contribute to major advances in
publicly-known cryptography. In fact, you could probably even say
that it's their job to inhibit such advances...
-russ <nelson@crynwr.com>
Crynwr Software | Crynwr Software sells packet driver support | ask4 PGP key
11 Grant St. | +1 315 268 1925 (9201 FAX) | Quakers do it in the light
Potsdam, NY 13676 | LPF member - ask me about the harm software patents do.