NODE 32af7b94Re: Help A Novice Understand
harveyrj@vt.edu (R. J. Harvey)Mon, 6 Jun 94 12:17:16 PDT
>
>Someone said that Sternlight is a high-placed govt official. I don't
>believe this. I think he is a retired old fart with a home computer
>and an internet acct.
>
Having been naive enough to actually read a number of his posts
regarding PGP-related topics on the usenet groups, I would likewise
be amazed if "Dr. Sternlight" was indeed a 'highly placed' govt
official, if for no other reason than it would be inconceivable
for any branch of our government that's supposed to operate in secret
to allow the stream of effluent that he generates over the net to
appear _with attribution_. A wanna-be net-cop with too much time
on his hands, perhaps, but a high government offical in a
super-secret agency??? NOT!
------------------------------------------------------------------
R. J. Harvey (email: harveyrj@vt.edu)
PGP key 0BADDDB5 (82 42 53 EA 97 B0 A2 B2 FC 92 90 BB C2 26 FD 21)
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of my employer
NODE 63a026e3REMAILERS: standard xx-To: line
steve willey <willey@bach.seattleu.edu>Mon, 6 Jun 94 13:18:26 PDT
cp's,
matt just mentioned that remailer@soda doesn't accept "Request-Remailing-To"
header lines (which explains why i thought it was dead) and i note that not
all other remailers accept "Anon-Send-To:". anarchy has it's place in
our lives but, it would be nice to cut down on sode come in remailing and
ping scripts. the three close to standard headers seem to be
"Anon-Send-To:", "Request-Remailing-To:", and "X-Anon-To:". it would be
more convenient :) for all remailers to either allow all three or settle
on one standard (nfl).
thanks,
steve
------
** stephen willey DoD# 0769, 1Kspt=5.80, prez IBMC * '92 CFM-2 **
** willey@seattleu.edu pgp key on server * '81 GS450 **
** "The tree of liberty must from time to time be * '73 RD350 **
** refreshed by the blood of patriots and tyrants." t. jefferson **
NODE e6e7ace1Re: Help A Novice Understand
jamesd@netcom.com (James A. Donald)Mon, 6 Jun 94 13:35:25 PDT
> >Someone said that Sternlight is a high-placed govt official. I don't
> >believe this.
(That someone was me, folks.)
According to Tommy <nobody@soda.berkeley.edu>
David Sternlight is a member of the council on foreign
relations (pg. 176 of the 1993 Annual Report of the CFR)
The following Executive Branch officials are also
members of this organization:
William J. Clinton, President
Lloyd Cutler, Counsel to the President
George Stephanopoulos, Senior Advisor
David Gergen, Assistant to the President for Communications
W. Anthony Lake, Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs
Samuel R. Berger, Deputy Assistant to the President for National Security
Adm. William Crowe, Jr., Chairman, Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board
John H. Gibbons, Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy
Gen. Gordon R. Sullivan, Chief of Staff, Army \
Gen. Merrill A. McPeak, Chief of Staff, Air Force > Joint Chiefs of Staff
Gen. Carl E. Mundy, Commandant, Marine Corps /
R. James Woolsey, Director of Central Intelligence
Adm. William O. Studeman, Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Chairman, National Intelligence Council
**Stephan Breyer, Current nominee to the Supreme Court
**Alan Greenspan, Chairman of the Federal Reserve
(Paranoid commentary by Tommy edited out)
R. J. Harvey writes
> I would likewise
> be amazed if "Dr. Sternlight" was indeed a 'highly placed' govt
> official, if for no other reason than it would be inconceivable
> for any branch of our government that's supposed to operate in secret
> to allow the stream of effluent that he generates over the net to
> appear _with attribution_.
Compared to your typical high government official, David
Sternlight is a genius. Indeed if they were all as smart
as he is, I would be slightly worried - but only very
slightly. :-)
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our |
property, because of the kind of animals that we | James A. Donald
are. True law derives from this right, not from |
the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state. | jamesd@netcom.com