// COMPLETE THREAD

penet spoofs

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE fb6adad2penet spoofs
Yours truly has been stung. Someone used rjc@powermail.com to create
a penet address. Since I have never used that address to post
anywhere else except cypherpunks, the spoofer is probably on
cypherpunks. I thought it might have been caused by a penet'er
being subscribed to cypherpunks but a similar thing did not
happen to my other accounts.

-Ray
NODE f356035eRe: penet spoofs
>   Yours truly has been stung. Someone used rjc@powermail.com to create
> a penet address. Since I have never used that address to post
> anywhere else except cypherpunks, the spoofer is probably on
> cypherpunks. I thought it might have been caused by a penet'er
> being subscribed to cypherpunks but a similar thing did not
> happen to my other accounts.

Me too, but I suspect the asshole just sent a 'who cypherpunks' request
to majordomo@toad.com.  I've stated that I think LD has an anon account
at nyx.cs.du.edu, where the list is set up as a newsgroup.  Anyway, can
someone point out the procedure for asking Julf to delete my account in
the way that's least painful for him?  I suspect he's overwhelmed with
such requests...:-(


Alan Westrope                  <awestrop@nyx.cs.du.edu>
__________/|-,                 <adwestro@ouray.denver.colorado.edu>
   (_)    \|-'                  PGP 2.6 public key: finger/servers
PGP 0xB8359639:  D6 89 74 03 77 C8 2D 43   7C CA 6D 57 29 25 69 23
NODE 1475fb5cRe: penet spoofs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

In list.cypherpunks, Alan Westrope:

> Me too, but I suspect the asshole just sent a 'who cypherpunks' request
> to majordomo@toad.com.

Maybe not.  My personal address was used, but my list subscription
address wasn't.  (cypherpunks gets gated to a local newsgroup here, so I
can read it with news tools)
- -- 
       Roy M. Silvernail         [ ]  roy@sendai.cybrspc.mn.org
                    PGP public key available by mail
     echo /get /pub/pubkey.asc | mail file-request@cybrspc.mn.org
         These are, of course, my opinions (and my machines)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAwUBLjnc6Bvikii9febJAQFaVgQAvClV+v9+mAGPM1Tf000Dr/sqPuyAW36f
MsAs3yblljF9S756+/+bSipAa8eYVpGZp/N9vL3G4tPAVRce43nzVBpXuCu6ICrX
tAwCYPdkbJXHAr48sAFy+1FIYhvsHsJ3NclajwPdX+gFAmQo1TKcAi2F+J3JCrWn
eXEVuKcWyo4=
=mZG5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----