// COMPLETE THREAD

Re: Labeling Usenet articles.

2 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE b73f490bRe: Labeling Usenet articles.
> OK, so I want to enable the recieving of articles in conjunction with a 
> censorship service.  I guess the way to do this is a sig. of the article 
[...]
> Lets get the tools of crypto out there in advance.
 
How is crypto involved? You want to have everything arrive at your site
encrypted, and only be able to decrypt the stuff that you are permitted
by the censor to read? Why bother, why not just only send stuff to your site
that the censor permits you to read? If you don't want your entire site censored, but just want particular readers at your site to be censored, then the 
sysadmin should just set something up so users are only allowed to read
what the censor has allowed that user to read. I dont' see how crypto
comes into it at all.
 
I think you are going to have a lot of trouble getting any help with this
plan from this list. For one thing, it doesn't seem to require crypto
to implement, and for another, very few people on this list are going to
be interested in developing a censorship system. I don't think anyone
thinks you should be disallowed from doing so either, but people put their
time and energy into developing software that interests them and excites them,
and for most cypherpunks I don't think a censorship system does either.
NODE 52f4a7e1Re: Labeling Usenet articles.
On Mon, 1 Aug 1994, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> > OK, so I want to enable the recieving of articles in conjunction with a 
> > censorship service.  I guess the way to do this is a sig. of the article 
> > Lets get the tools of crypto out there in advance.
> How is crypto involved? You want to have everything arrive at your site
> encrypted, and only be able to decrypt the stuff that you are permitted
Strawman.  I am talking about OTHER information PROVIDED by CENSORS.  
There is nothing mandatory here, I am talking about geting a service out 
there so that they can buy it.

> by the censor to read? Why bother, why not just only send stuff to your site
> that the censor permits you to read? If you don't want your entire site censored, but just want particular readers at your site to be censored, then the 
> sysadmin should just set something up so users are only allowed to read
> what the censor has allowed that user to read. I dont' see how crypto
> comes into it at all.
Secure exchange of information.

I Was thinking about something like this.

<article number>{sig of article number with key}
...


A whole list that could be mailed to fundies, muslums, or kinky people 
saying "this is good/evil information"(for them) fufilling there need for 
self-censorship, and at the same time making money, as you only give out 
monthly keys.:-)

Berzerk.