NODE bc075098Re: broadcast encryption
snyderra@dunx1.ocs.drexel.edu (Bob Snyder)Wed, 10 Aug 94 06:42:42 PDT
At 12:34 PM 8/9/94, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>Eric Hughes says:
>> What I would like to see is low-level digital signatures on the
>> level of IP or AX.25. IP is doable, I would think.
>>
>> What is the policy purpose for signing packets? It will affect the
>> design.
>
>Anyone even making such suggestions has not been following the IPSP
>standardization work...
Is this the IPng work I just saw a bunch of RFC notices go out for, or
something different? Any drafts you can point me to?
Bob
--
Bob Snyder N2KGO MIME, PGP, RIPEM mail accepted
snyderra@post.drexel.edu PGP & RIPEM keys on key servers
When cryptography is outlawed, bayl bhgynjf jvyy unir cevinpl.
NODE 69c36c64Re: broadcast encryption
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>Wed, 10 Aug 94 06:45:06 PDT
Bob Snyder says:
> >Anyone even making such suggestions has not been following the IPSP
> >standardization work...
>
> Is this the IPng work I just saw a bunch of RFC notices go out for, or
> something different? Any drafts you can point me to?
I posted a summary to this very mailing list only a few days ago.
.pm