NODE 3a856902Morality masks technical ignorance
blancw@pylon.comWed, 28 Dec 94 23:47:02 PST
Responding to msg by rishab:
I always thought the emphasis on this list was on
_technological_ rather than _political_ or _legal_ or _moral_
means to protect privacy and free expression - including the
current limitations.
.......................................................
So Rishab - do you think there's any good reason why
governments shouldn't require the implementation of key escrow
(GAK) (I mean, aside from what something like the US
Constitution would have to say about it), or any good reason
why any cypherpunk should protest it?
The key words in my inquiry are *reason why*.
..
Blanc
NODE d5d1ad3fRe: Morality masks technical ignorance
Adam Shostack <adam@bwh.harvard.edu>Thu, 29 Dec 94 07:34:49 PST
The technical reason to oppose GAK is that it adds points of
failure to a crypto system which need not be there. Those POF are not
adequately tied to the consequences of their actions (releasing a key
improperly), and as such will be used as points to attack the
integrity of the system.
Adam
Blanc wrote:
| Responding to msg by rishab:
|
| I always thought the emphasis on this list was on
| _technological_ rather than _political_ or _legal_ or _moral_
| means to protect privacy and free expression - including the
| current limitations.
| .......................................................
|
| So Rishab - do you think there's any good reason why
| governments shouldn't require the implementation of key escrow
| (GAK) (I mean, aside from what something like the US
| Constitution would have to say about it), or any good reason
| why any cypherpunk should protest it?
|
| The key words in my inquiry are *reason why*.