NODE 1ba6c109Re: Need program pointers
an448@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (Yves Bellefeuille)Sat, 26 Nov 94 19:30:54 PST
Ben wrote:
>Norton has a decent wipefile. I don't know if it exists with the current
>distribution, but with 4.5(which I have) it has it.
Norton's Wipeinfo is not too bad, but I have found one major problem and
a few minor problems with versions 7 and 8:
Major problem: The documentation says that Wipeinfo automatically disables
Smartcan, the undelete utility. In fact, it doesn't do so, at least on my
system. If you don't disable Smartcan manually, you can simply undelete
the "wiped" files.
For this reason, I no longer trust Wipeinfo to automatically disable my
cache; I turn the cache off manually before using Wipeinfo.
Minor problems: If you use the options to wipe file slack or unused space,
Wipeinfo will not wipe the directory entries for deleted files. Using
DiskEdit in hex view, you can still see that you once had a file called
?ECRET. However, using Wipeinfo to wipe a file will also wipe the
directory entry.
And Wipeinfo will only wipe some areas of the disk (track 0, for example),
if you choose to do a "government wipe". Doing a "fast wipe" will not wipe
these areas, even if you choose to wipe the entire drive.
The documentation for Secure File System (SFS) has interesting information
on wiping disks. Peter Gutmann says this:
There is a commonly-held belief that there is a US government standard
for declassifying magnetic media which involves overwriting it three
times. In fact this method is for declassifying core (computer memory)
rather than magnetic media. The government standard for declassifying
magnetic media probably involves concentrated acid, furnaces, belt
sanders, or any combination of the above.
--
Yves Bellefeuille, Ottawa, Canada
an448@freenet.carleton.ca (finger here for PGP key)
ua294@fim.uni-erlangen.de
NODE 3b9e1ba0Need program pointers
pstemari@fsp.fsp.com (Paul Ste. Marie)Wed, 30 Nov 94 19:58:07 PST
> There is a commonly-held belief that there is a US government standard
> for declassifying magnetic media which involves overwriting it three
> times. In fact this method is for declassifying core (computer memory)
> rather than magnetic media. The government standard for declassifying
> magnetic media probably involves concentrated acid, furnaces, belt
> sanders, or any combination of the above.
For magentic media, which includes core :), I believe the standard is
overwriting the info alternately with 0's and 1's 100x.
Paul
NODE 64a7260eRe: Need program pointers
Black Unicorn <unicorn@access.digex.net>Wed, 30 Nov 94 20:03:45 PST
On Wed, 30 Nov 1994, Paul Ste. Marie wrote:
> > There is a commonly-held belief that there is a US government standard
> > for declassifying magnetic media which involves overwriting it three
> > times. In fact this method is for declassifying core (computer memory)
> > rather than magnetic media. The government standard for declassifying
> > magnetic media probably involves concentrated acid, furnaces, belt
> > sanders, or any combination of the above.
>
> For magentic media, which includes core :), I believe the standard is
> overwriting the info alternately with 0's and 1's 100x.
>
> Paul
>
Close contact with a thermite gernade is the standard most agencies I
know of follow.
073BB885A786F666 nemo repente fuit turpissimus - potestas scientiae in usu est
6E6D4506F6EDBC17 quaere verum ad infinitum, loquitur sub rosa - wichtig!