NODE a17efbf0Re: alt.anonymous.messages propagation
cactus@seabsd.hks.net (L. Todd Masco)Mon, 12 Dec 94 00:29:40 PST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
L. McCarthy <lmccarth@ducie.cs.umass.edu> wrote:
>Hmmm, does MIT get alt.anonymous at least ? I understand alt.anonymous was
>created to serve a purpose similar to that of alt.privacy.anon-server, but
>at the moment it's a de facto equivalent of alt.anonymous.messages.
>alt.anonymous is somewhat better propagated than a.a.m, from what I've heard.
Nope, no alt.anonymous. 'Leastaways, not off the servers that the turist
accounts use. And since I configured news on the machine, I'd love to
hear if there are MIT servers that have a larger set than life.ai's.
>You should request one or both groups from the MIT news admins. If users there
>want to read the group, they'll likely be quite happy to carry it.
Alas, I am but a turist at MIT, though one who helps maintain the turist
machine. I'll be looking at getting a real newsfeed from elsewhere,
but asking the MIT newsadmins for favors isn't in the cards. If anybody
here has a bit of a stronger standing on campus, their asking would
be way cool.
>I'm a fairly well-known regular in alt.config, and I believe I can probably
>recruit some prominent news admins to send booster newgroup messages for
>alt.anonymous.messages. Apart from that, it's a matter of people asking their
>local news admins to pick up the group if they aren't already carrying it.
That would be a most excellent thing to do, regardless of how it affects my
situation.
- --
Todd Masco | It's difficult to be loud about keeping your enumerated
cactus@hks.net | rights when you're busy exercising your unenumerated ones.
cactus@bb.com | http://www.hks.net/~cactus/cactus.html
- ---
[This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature
means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the
signature and forwarded.]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Gratis auto-signing service
iQBFAwUBLuwLBSoZzwIn1bdtAQHxqgGA3WuDp+3/5A8pqGNpFc5UqAVJafaSL7je
bUpZDrHpYMXycfCUPAgh+HpxJpCTLWU1
=c8Gt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
NODE afa8041bRe: alt.anonymous.messages propagation
Derek Atkins <warlord@MIT.EDU>Mon, 12 Dec 94 13:28:00 PST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
To: cactus@seabsd.hks.net (L. Todd Masco)
cc: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: alt.anonymous.messages propagation
Hi.
> Nope, no alt.anonymous. 'Leastaways, not off the servers that the turist
> accounts use. And since I configured news on the machine, I'd love to
> hear if there are MIT servers that have a larger set than life.ai's.
I just looked on news.mit.edu and bloom-beacon.mit.edu (the MIT
news-transport machine), and I found both alt.anonymous and
alt.anonymous.messages, so I don't think saying "MIT doesn't get
alt.anonymous" is at all correct.
It may be correct to say that "GNU.AI.MIT.EDU doesn't get
alt.anonymous", but GNU is _NOT_ MIT!
- -derek
for the News.MIT.EDU maintainers! :-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQBuAwUBLuy/5zh0K1zBsGrxAQGb9gLDBZPtRM9tJrgdLp4VwV7Du7fpECIFPYn2
pqXt34MG/kqsN4oo9+YQC89tZz0SshYb83N9QwWemukebN+9cyFvKZbxdzcOjXmj
5bztgIpFd++xX1KdIdi++N8=
=2SFX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----