NODE 4fb5ad2dFrom me to me to you...The Actual Article
Carol Anne Braddock <carolann@mm.com>Fri, 6 Jan 95 23:59:11 PST
Dear All of You,
This is the article, and what I did with it. It is complete in it's
entireity, from the bang paths, to the crosspostings. Please study them
carefully, for my next post will contain the first response to the article,
three days later. ALL DURING THIS TIME, I WAS LED TO BELIEVE, THROUGH PHONE
CALLS THAT THIS WAS "GOING TO BE INVESTIGATED SOON". NOTHING OF THE SORT
HAPPENED. NO ONE IN ANY OF THE TEN GROUPS RAISED A SINGLE OBJECTION. PERIOD.
I believe in your capacity to fairly judge.
My response to the first complaint lies
still censored in my mail reader.
For if .1% of all the Usenet
is inappropriate to
post to, when
will it
become
just
.01%
?
Now, the article,
NODE 03b550fcRe: From me to me to you...The Actual Article
"James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>Sat, 7 Jan 95 22:13:50 PST
The world is full of self important assholes. You will go
mad trying to deal with people like him.
Life is too short. From time to time post messages belittling
him and his service, and get on with a new service.
If you find a reasonably priced 28KB SLIP connection let me know.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our
property, because of the kind of animals that we James A. Donald
are. True law derives from this right, not from
the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state. jamesd@netcom.com