NODE 7bd0b9ccRe: Anonymous payment scheme
pstemari@erinet.com (Paul J. Ste. Marie)Tue, 3 Jan 95 17:48:08 PST
At 09:45 AM 1/3/95 -0800, Hal wrote:
> ... As I wrote, banks are
>required to get SS#'s for depositers right now, and I wouldn't expect
>that to change any time soon. If anything, the trend appears to be
>towards more tightening rather than less. ...
Isn't that only a requirement on interst-bearing, or potentially
interest-bearing, accounts?
--Paul J. Ste. Marie
pstemari@well.sf.ca.us, pstemari@erinet.com
NODE 7a77e128Re: Anonymous payment scheme
Jonathan Cooper <entropy@IntNet.net>Tue, 3 Jan 95 19:32:00 PST
> I've heard of that, but I thought it was only a redundancy check to check
> for read errors in the swiping process.
That's why they use checksums - I have some information about the
VISA-net authorization network (which came from Phrack) and also some
about the actual encoding of the card, if anyone cares.
-jon
( --------[ Jonathan D. Cooper ]--------[ entropy@intnet.net ]-------- )
( PGP 2.6.2 keyprint: 31 50 8F 82 B9 79 ED C4 5B 12 A0 35 E0 9B C0 01 )
( home page: http://taz.hyperreal.com/~entropy/ ]---[ Key-ID: 4082CCB5 )