NODE 3a20a6bcRe: LOCKSMITH'S GUILD WANTS L
Mark Grant <mark@unicorn.com>Wed, 25 Jan 95 08:19:46 PST
On Wed, 25 Jan 1995, Charles Bell wrote:
> how do
> we ensure that those skyscrapers don't fall down on us? That the surgeon
> who is going to open me up knows something about surgery? That my money
> is at least somewhat safe in the bank?
With non-government reptutation and certification agencies. Currently the
government is saying 'there shall be one certification agency and it shall
be us', whereas personally if I were hiring someone to design a skyscraper
or cut me open I'd much prefer to pick someone who had a good rating from
three or four independent agencies.
The only difference is that you would have the choice of choosing someone
cheap who didn't have a good reputation, not that we'd give up on them
altogether (see the numerous past discussions of reputations etc on the
list, and the Cyphernomicon).
> ....once we get past what seems to be your utter refusal to consider
> the possibility that government could ever do anything right ....
Another thing to consider is that the government monopoly has a lot less
to lose by certifying people incorrectly than a commercial agency would.
The government's reputation is low enough already that such errors won't
affect it significantly, whereas a commercial agency would lose a lot of
custom to its competitors.
Mark
NODE f97947abRe: LOCKSMITH'S GUILD WANTS L
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@imsi.com>Wed, 25 Jan 95 08:29:58 PST
Mark Grant says:
>
> On Wed, 25 Jan 1995, Charles Bell wrote:
>
> > how do
> > we ensure that those skyscrapers don't fall down on us? That the surgeon
> > who is going to open me up knows something about surgery? That my money
> > is at least somewhat safe in the bank?
>
> With non-government reptutation and certification agencies.
I'll point out that insurance companies have typically taken on this
role, being at risk in these instances. "Underwriters Laboratories"
work with electrical safety is a real world example in which this
actually happened.
However, could we please take this discussion to someplace like
talk.politics.libertarian? The mere fact that I agree with the point
doesn't mean that I have an interest in seeing the only place for
cypherpunk discussion taken over by discussion of the evils of
government.
.pm