Jefferson Wheel Cypher

Message-Id: <v01510103ab5ed2c136c8@DialupEudora>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

A couple of questions regarding Thomas Jefferson's Wheel Ciphyer:

1) How would you classify this cipher?  It looks to me like a polyalphabetic
   with the plaintext also being the key, kind of like an autokey.  Am 
   I correct, or is this cipher a different animal entirely?

2) Can anyone point me to references on the cryptanalysis of this cipher?
   
Many thanks in advance,

Ken

= Ken Kirksey            And the Clinton administration launched an attack on =
= kkirksey@world.std.com  people in Texas because those people were religious =
= Mac Guru & Developer    nuts with guns.  Hell, this country was founded by  =
=                         religious nuts with guns.           - P.J. O'Rourke =

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6

iQCVAwUBLzkjt+sZNYlu+zuBAQEwPgP/XMWm/qDr1A0D49iBJdYNOX18j3DNbBvG
xTOvSrzNziq9jq4026+TNpM3+PVGiji85yL3053jG26I0dJbckkVFr1PBfXmLrua
nHBt5t/qy7RSvjsW80ZreeqVKwulo3NtT+XuWjU7EXZDSPUZts4JuHnGdlqQRiMo
1ERDP4+StM0=
=PcEo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Isn't that the same as Bazeries' Cylinder Cipher, where you have a bunch of
disks with mixed alphabets around the edges, you put them on a rod in some
order, set the plaintext along a row, then read the ciphertext off any
other row?  If so, a short paper of mine was just printed in "The
Cryptogram" (JF95 issue) about cryptanalyzing it.  A US military field
cipher was based on the Jefferson version; I handled a copy (with metal
disks) in the National Cryptologic Museum just outside Ft. Meade last
summer.  There may even be an Aegean Park Press publication on it.  The
servicemen hated it -- fiddling with all the disks in the heat of battle
made it cumbersome for tactical use.

If it's as I describe, I'd call it a multiple-key polyalphabetic: keyed
alphabets, keyed order, and (potentially ambiguous) offset key for
deciding how far around the cylinder to go.  The period is how many disks
you have, since they stay in the same order (but with different relative
offset) for the whole message.  It's not really an autokey under the
Meaning of the Act, since there's no feed-forward from one letter to the next.

I'm sure Kahn's "The Codebreakers" will have more info.

	Jim Gillogly
	Highday, 18 Solmath S.R. 1995, 21:59