// COMPLETE THREAD

Judges-L FAQ

3 expanded posts ยท every known parent and child

NODE c64d4b52Judges-L FAQ
It has come to my attention that the Judges-L FAQ is being distributed
by someone who obtained it on this list, and being sent to people made
to look as if it has issued from David Stodolsky.  

I must inform you that this FAQ is copyrighted material, and 
you are requested not to distribute it. 


-Craig
NODE 85582203Re: Judges-L FAQ
"Craig A. Johnston" says:
> 
> It has come to my attention that the Judges-L FAQ is being distributed
> by someone who obtained it on this list, and being sent to people made
> to look as if it has issued from David Stodolsky.  
> 
> I must inform you that this FAQ is copyrighted material, and 
> you are requested not to distribute it. 

If the material is not actually registered with the copyright office,
I'll point out that at most you can get the distribution stopped, but
cannot get damages for the distribution. Unless you actually intend to
spend substantial sums on lawyers, you are unlikely to be able to do
even this much.

Perry
NODE 34c334c7Re: Judges-L FAQ
> "Craig A. Johnston" <caj@tower.techwood.org> writes:
> 
> It has come to my attention that the Judges-L FAQ is being distributed
> by someone who obtained it on this list, and being sent to people made
> to look as if it has issued from David Stodolsky.  

> I must inform you that this FAQ is copyrighted material, and 
> you are requested not to distribute it. 

A version of this FAQ with Message-ID <01050105.hhv9l1@arch.ping.dk> was
posted from Stodolsky's machine in Denmark on 17 Dec 94 by
judges@arch.ping.dk to news.admin.* and misc.legal, asking for feedback
and asking for no distribution restrictions.  IANAL, but it looks to me
like your genie's out of the bottle.

	Jim Gillogly
	Highday, 18 Solmath S.R. 1995, 21:35