S314 and potential hell-raising

It seems that 314 is a VERY BIG potental problem, and we should
probably be doing everything in our power to find out what it REALLY
means and fight it tooth and nail.  I think Usenet is the perfect
place to take this fight, but I'm not sure what groups are best 
suited to a discussion.  Any suggestions?

We simply MUST isolate this bill and, if it even comes close to sounding
like what I think it does (ending the near-absolute freedom of expression
and content across the Internet), we must fight it in every way possible,
enlisting the ACLU, the EFF, and any other group potentially willing
to pour money into a legal battle.

(me)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


In article <3hb6vd$2q4@gap.cco.caltech.edu>, you wrote:

> We simply MUST isolate this bill and, if it even comes close to sounding
> like what I think it does (ending the near-absolute freedom of expression
> and content across the Internet), we must fight it in every way possible,
> enlisting the ACLU, the EFF, and any other group potentially willing
> to pour money into a legal battle.

I just got a reply from Stanton M. from EFF today. To paraphrase, "No we're
not in favor of it and we're working on a response."

- --
==============================================================================
skaplin@skypoint.com                   | Finger skaplin@infinity.c2.org for
                                       | a listing of crypto related files
PGP encrypted mail is accepted and     | available on my auto-responder.
preferred.                             | (Yes...the faqs are there!)
                                       |
Finger skaplin@mirage.skypoint.com for | "...vidi vici veni" - Overheard
PGP public key.                        | outside a Roman brothel.
                                       |
Fax Number  +1 (612) 928-9771          | An UZI beats five aces every time...
==============================================================================
         A pessimist sees "No parking." - An optimist sees "Anytime."

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBLzmujslnXxBRSgfNAQFk8gf8DDjpbTHnSAb9os88Xu2UlYfJWsAoNFf5
cT8kY9XS0yRyeTfIuKmiZqC+tc1QqA6+K/EgwFYlpx9TY3dgn44hrWlAQkMRR4a5
P9ugjtNJXIlbWlS6r4XSOZeUABy8WnQfkkHM2UHAKtmxv2dnA7nXBzkeWAuF7kMc
ECgBbb468jMQOVhXjKxVXh/KLQtw/Ujb89jMBlQa5wi2ddnQ0fisDwhH0ZhKQ9Ih
GkJHhZCiIUEoCe09ye3eM5pyM9BuXr5hjV7pPUuXtFjqHeFFHZdLRv/ERuHL7z4n
w7JuxxyHmh84ZG4f9asakuFL3eLHuIEId5LJvtKN7BMnMv+iVPDZHQ==
=pPn0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

> 
> I just got a reply from Stanton M. from EFF today. To paraphrase, "No we're
> not in favor of it and we're working on a response."
>
What other kind of responce other than no compromise should be entertained?

                                                Ravage
                                                 A
                                                  Konfused
                                                   Xfrmr