NODE f8c730cfRe: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Carl Ellison <cme@tis.com>Wed, 8 Feb 95 13:53:46 PST
>Sender: owner-cp-lite@comsec.com
>X-Signed: PGP-Detached-2-3,
> iQBXAwUBLzhSutC3U5sdKpFdAQEEqwIMCg1PFWC19WuW2BhwmzUyg84RthT/61x9
> vLrIPbgrYcCXCNB8F51tQogs5lBrry/aOk2Fk3Izl//XC4KDl+cADrCz
>Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:24:01 PST
>From: jpp@markv.com
>of the very most important rights. To hold the owner of a buliten
>board responsible for the illegal messages posted to it, is to force
>the buliten board owner to become a government censor in all but name
>(and wages).
anyone heard of "no unfunded mandates" ?
NODE 3a40330cRe: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl <rrothenb@ic.sunysb.edu>Thu, 9 Feb 95 06:58:53 PST
> >Date: Tue, 7 Feb 95 21:24:01 PST
> >From: jpp@markv.com
>
> >of the very most important rights. To hold the owner of a buliten
> >board responsible for the illegal messages posted to it, is to force
> >the buliten board owner to become a government censor in all but name
> >(and wages).
>
> anyone heard of "no unfunded mandates" ?
It's not a mandate. It's an order from god. (As if you didn't know, it
says in the bible that the Republican party is his official mouthpiece.)
NODE 466902b1Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
"James A. Donald" <jamesd@netcom.com>Thu, 9 Feb 95 15:13:35 PST
On Thu, 9 Feb 1995, Robert Rothenburg Walking-Owl wrote:
> It's not a mandate. It's an order from god. (As if you didn't know, it
> says in the bible that the Republican party is his official mouthpiece.)
Exon, who is the primary sponsor and spokesman for the
"Communications Decency Act" is a tax-and-spend Democrat.
This conforms to my expectations, prejudices, and assumptions
about the way the world works.
I assume your prejudices are different.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
We have the right to defend ourselves | http://www.catalog.com/jamesd/
and our property, because of the kind |
of animals that we are. True law | James A. Donald
derives from this right, not from the |
arbitrary power of the omnipotent state. | jamesd@netcom.com
NODE 768e6a47Re: Effects of S.314 (Communications Decency Act)
slowdog <slowdog@wookie.net>Wed, 8 Feb 95 21:08:42 PST
On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, Carl Ellison wrote:
> >From: jpp@markv.com
>
> >of the very most important rights. To hold the owner of a buliten
> >board responsible for the illegal messages posted to it, is to force
> >the buliten board owner to become a government censor in all but name
> >(and wages).
>
> anyone heard of "no unfunded mandates" ?
This is one of my favorite pet arguments in this case. With the no
unfunded mandates notion in the air for the States, why can't sysops
demand the same treatment, given the resources that would have to be
devoted to tracking content on their sysytems.
- dog