Re: SurfWatch for employees (ugh)

At 11:36 PM 7/17/95 -0700, Greg Broiles wrote:
>Consistent with the trend towards treating employees like children,

I'm not surprised someone sees a market for this.  I've worked at
a number of customer sites that block access to 900 numbers and
local pay-per-call numbers, which also blocks access to Time-of-day
and some vendors' customer-support numbers.

>Webster Network Strategies has announced (but apparently has not
>shipped) a product similar to SurfWatch but aimed at an employment
>environment. The product is called "WebTrack" and supposedly supports
>access lists of URLs, where access can be allowed to "all but these sites"
>or "only to these sites". The product also can be configured to log all 
>Web usage by users subjected to its reign of terror. :) WebTrack 
>is priced at $7,500 with an annual subscription to 

I assume for that price that it's a gateway product, rather than a site
license for a censored client (which would require sysadmins to go hunt
down everybody's copy of netscape...)  If so, I hope the system at least offers
caching (to save on outside bandwidth requirements and download time),
and has a fair amount of security so it doesn't become a hole in the firewall.

>its list of interesting (err, forbidden) sites priced at $1,500. 
Wow!  Folks have finally found a way to get paid for looking for porn on the
net! :-)
Surfwatch doesn't make it's censored list easily available (otherwise it'd
probably get pirated, or used as an "interesting sites" index...), but
apparently
it blocks access to things other than just pornography - does Webster
indicate what categories of stuff they're blocking?

#                                Thanks;  Bill
# Bill Stewart, Freelance Information Architect, stewarts@ix.netcom.com

Bill Stewart writes:

> >its list of interesting (err, forbidden) sites priced at $1,500. 
> Wow!  Folks have finally found a way to get paid for looking for porn on the
> net! :-)
> Surfwatch doesn't make it's censored list easily available (otherwise it'd
> probably get pirated, or used as an "interesting sites" index...), but
> apparently
> it blocks access to things other than just pornography - does Webster
> indicate what categories of stuff they're blocking?

I think there's a definite need here. If some obliging soul can "blow the
whistle" by posting to the net 1) Surfwatch's list of banned sites, and/or
2) the criteria Surfwatch uses when determining what sites to block, it
would certainly be beneficial. At the very least, it would allow everyone
to see what sort of information they believe is "harmful to minors".

-- 

 frogfarm@yakko.cs.wmich.edu | To ensure ABSOLUTE FREEDOM, take RESPONSIBILITY
    imschira@nyx10.cs.du.edu | Encrypt! Encrypt! All-One-Key! Complete Privacy
             Damaged Justice | through Complex Mathematics! God's law PREVENTS
Need net.help? I'm available | decryption above 1024 bytes - Exceptions? None!

Date: Tue, 18 Jul 1995 15:57:54 -0700
   From: stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)
   Cc: info@webster.com
   Sender: owner-cypherpunks@toad.com

   At 11:36 PM 7/17/95 -0700, Greg Broiles wrote:
   >Consistent with the trend towards treating employees like children,

   I'm not surprised someone sees a market for this.  I've worked at
   a number of customer sites that block access to 900 numbers and
   local pay-per-call numbers, which also blocks access to Time-of-day
   and some vendors' customer-support numbers.

Also 911 apparently, I've heard...

-- 
david taffs <dat@ebt.com>