NODE fb7a84c5First Virtual, Nathaniel Boorenstein
nobody@valhalla.phoenix.net (Anonymous)Sat, 29 Jul 95 02:05:26 PDT
Mr. Borenstein's text production rate is truly amazing. We should
induct him into the Internet Hall-of-Fame immediately.
He rivals Kibo in his ability to detect messages about himself or his
company. He rivals Sternlight in his ability to generate endless
streams of minor points.
Crypto-relevance:
1) What technique could be used to differentiate Boorenstein's rants
from automatic rant generator output? Has First Virtual done this?
If someone wanted to generate a Borenstein rant-generator, god knows
that there's enough low-entropy sample material out there.
2) If you're looking for keywords to insert into your M-x
spook-the-spooks generator, try Borenstein and First Virtual.
NODE ae1c8737Re: First Virtual, Nathaniel Boorenstein
"Donald M. Kitchen" <don@cs.byu.edu>Sat, 29 Jul 95 02:26:22 PDT
Anonymous:
> Mr. Borenstein's text production rate is truly amazing. We should
> induct him into the Internet Hall-of-Fame immediately.
>
> He rivals Kibo in his ability to detect messages about himself or his
> company. He rivals Sternlight in his ability to generate endless
> streams of minor points.
This whole thread has me wondering what "ELL DEE" is up to these days.
Ooops, I think I just added another msg to the thread.
Good thing it's not signed, I'll deny I sent it.
In order to give this message an ObCrypto, might I mention that we actually
had some traffic on the #crypto/#cpunks channels recently. No alt.conspiracy
or rant-o-matics either!!
Don
NODE b47f9900Re: First Virtual, Nathaniel Boorenstein
"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@panix.com>Sat, 29 Jul 95 08:07:20 PDT
Anonymous Asshole writes:
> Mr. Borenstein's text production rate is truly amazing. We should
> induct him into the Internet Hall-of-Fame immediately.
god, you're a clueless jerk, whomever you are. What's Nat done to you?
.pm