NODE 54508cb8Re: PRZ encrypted voice software release imminent
shamrock@netcom.com (Lucky Green)Fri, 11 Aug 95 09:37:28 PDT
At 9:36 8/11/95, Ray Cromwell wrote:
> My question is, how portable is it, and does it work over TCP/IP rather
>than just modem connections (I suggested this about a year ago)? My ideal
>implementation would function on the following architectures:
I can't comment on the features of PGPFone. However, know that Internet
telephony (as all "real time" services) work overe UDP only, not TCP.
-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com>
PGP encrypted mail preferred.
NODE 68cdaf3fRe: PRZ encrypted voice software release imminent
Ray Cromwell <rjc@clark.net>Fri, 11 Aug 95 10:50:51 PDT
>
> At 9:36 8/11/95, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> > My question is, how portable is it, and does it work over TCP/IP rather
> >than just modem connections (I suggested this about a year ago)? My ideal
> >implementation would function on the following architectures:
>
> I can't comment on the features of PGPFone. However, know that Internet
> telephony (as all "real time" services) work overe UDP only, not TCP.
If you reread my message, you'll see I mentioned UDP. I just refer
to IP protocols in general as "TCP/IP", implicit is that UDP and ICMP
are atleast included. The mention of "Winsock" should give you the context.
-Ray